Page 155 - Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
P. 155

People of different cultures or worldviews may differ in   the environment’s intrinsic value, which he maintained was
                     their values and thus may disagree about actions they consider   infinite and priceless. “Nature conservation must be framed
                     to be right or wrong. Because of these differences, some ethi-  as a moral issue,” McCauley wrote. “We will make more pro-
                     cists are relativists, believing that ethics do and should vary with   gress in the long run by appealing to people’s hearts rather
                     social context. However, different societies show a remarkable   than to their wallets.”
                     extent of agreement on what moral standards are appropriate.
                     For this reason, many ethicists are universalists, maintaining
                     that there exist objective notions of right and wrong that hold   Environmental ethics pertains to people
                     across cultures and contexts. For both relativists and universal-  and the environment
                     ists, ethics is a prescriptive pursuit; rather than simply describ-
                     ing behavior, it prescribes how we ought to behave.  The application of ethical standards to relationships between
                                                                          people and nonhuman entities is known as  environmental
                                                                          ethics. This branch of ethics arose once people began to per-
                     Ethical standards help us judge right                ceive environmental change brought by industrialization. Our
                     from wrong                                           interactions with our environment can give rise to ethical ques-
                                                                          tions that are difficult to resolve. Consider some examples:
                     Ethical standards are the criteria that help differentiate right
                     from wrong. We all employ ethical standards as tools for mak-    1.  Is the present generation obligated to conserve resourc-
                     ing countless decisions in our everyday lives. One classic ethi-  es for future generations? If so, how much should we
                     cal standard is the categorical imperative proposed by German   conserve?
                     philosopher Immanuel Kant, which advises us to treat others     2.  Can we justify exposing some communities to a dispro-
                     as we would prefer to be treated ourselves. In Christianity this   portionate share of pollution? If not, what actions are
                     standard is called the “Golden Rule,” and most of the world’s   warranted to prevent this?
                     religions teach this same lesson. Another ethical standard is     3.  Are humans  justified in driving species  to extinction?
                     the  principle of utility, elaborated by British philosophers    If destroying a forest would drive extinct an insect spe-
                     Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian principle   cies few people have heard of but would create jobs for
                     holds that something is right when it produces the greatest   10,000 people, would that action be ethically admissi-
                     practical benefits for the most people.                  ble? What if it were an owl species? What if only 100
                                                                              jobs would be created? What if it were a species harmful
                     We value things in two ways                              to people, such as a mosquito, bacterium, or virus?

                     People ascribe value to things in two main ways. One way is to   The first question is central to the notion of sustaina-
                     value something for the pragmatic benefits it brings us if we put   bility (p. 32) and to the pursuit of sustainable development
                     it to use. This is termed instrumental value (or utilitarian value).   (pp. 174–175), which lie at the heart of environmental sci-
                     The other way is to value something for its intrinsic worth, to   ence. Sustainability means leaving our descendants a world
                     feel that something has a right to exist and is valuable for its own   in which they can meet their needs at least as well as we have
                     sake. This notion is termed intrinsic value or inherent value.  met ours. From an ethical perspective, sustainability means
                        A person may ascribe instrumental value to a forest   treating future generations as we would prefer to be treated
                     because we can harvest timber from it, hunt game in it, and   ourselves. The second question goes to the heart of environ-
                     drink clean water it has captured and filtered. A person may   mental justice, which we will tackle shortly (pp. 158–159).
                     perceive intrinsic value in a forest because it provides homes   The third set of questions involves intrinsic values (but also
                     for countless organisms that the person feels have an inher-  instrumental values) and typifies questions that arise in
                     ent right to live alongside us on our shared planet. A forest,   debates over endangered species management, habitat pro-
                     an animal, a lake, or a mountain can have both intrinsic and   tection, and conservation biology (Chapter 11).
                     instrumental value. However, different people may emphasize
                     different types of value.                            We have expanded our ethical consideration
                        Paying  money  for  ecosystem  services  is  a  utilitar-
                     ian approach that attempts to quantify instrumental values   Answers to questions like those above depend partly on what
                     by assigning market prices to them. For people who tend   ethical standard(s) a person adopts. They also depend on the
                     to view nature through the lens of  intrinsic values, this   breadth and inclusiveness of the person’s domain of ethical
                     approach makes them uneasy. Indeed, scientists who share   concern. A person who ascribes intrinsic value to insects and
                     the goal of conserving natural amenities sometimes disagree   feels responsibility for their welfare would answer the third
                     on  the  means  of  doing  so.  For  instance,  Stanford  Univer-  set of questions very differently from a person whose domain
                     sity biologist Gretchen Daily is a key proponent of assign-  of ethical concern ends with human beings.
                     ing market values to ecosystem services, with the utilitarian   Many traditional non-Western cultures have long
                     goal of engaging market forces to assist in their conservation.   granted nonhuman entities intrinsic value and ethical stand-
                     Yet in 2006 a student in her department, Douglas McCauley,   ing. Australian Aborigines view their landscape as sacred
                     authored a commentary in the scientific journal Nature that   and alive. Many native cultures across the Americas feature
                     argued eloquently against such an approach. McCauley   ethical systems that encompass both people and aspects of
             154     warned that the “commodification of nature” distracted from   their environment.







           M06_WITH7428_05_SE_C06.indd   154                                                                                    12/12/14   2:57 PM
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160