Page 261 - Introduction to Business
P. 261

CHAPTER 7    Motivating and Leading Employees  235


                 piece-rate system, where employees are paid on the basis of the number of units  piece-rate system A compensation
                 they produce. This system is used even today in several sectors of economies world-  method where employees are paid on
                                                                                            the basis of the number of units they
                 wide, like apparel and shoe production. Under Taylor’s piece-rate system, all factory
                                                                                            produce
                 workers are paid a specific amount to produce a certain minimum number of units
                 of goods. However, if the worker exceeds the target output, the worker is paid at a
                 higher rate for all the units produced.
                    Taylor’s pioneering work has had profound global impact, as countries all over
                 the world adopted key elements of his time-and-motion studies (industrial engi-  time-and-motion studies Studies that
                 neering techniques used to determine the best approach to perform jobs effi-  measure the time taken to conduct each
                                                                                           subactivity of a job in order to determine
                 ciently) to increase production efficiency, specialization of labor, and assembly line
                                                                                           the best approach to performing the
                 production techniques.  Taylor’s scientific management theory is used today in  total job efficiently
                 industries such as automobile assembly and meatpacking to maximize efficiency
                 by carefully studying the best and least-cost approach of delivering quality prod-
                 ucts to customers. Although Taylor’s scientific management techniques have revo-
                 lutionized production management, his assumption that increased pay would lead
                 to rising worker motivation is relatively simplistic and not universally held. Taylor’s
                 ideas may be valid especially in developing countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin
                 America that have low income levels and young populations, but they may not hold
                 in affluent countries of Europe, East Asia, and North America, where the motiva-
                 tion-productivity relationship is more complex.
                   reality      How would you feel about being compensated using a piece-rate
                  CH ECK        system?



                    LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3
                    Compare the behavioral studies of Elton Mayo with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs,
                    and explain which theory is more meaningful today.


                 Behavior Theory: The Hawthorne Studies

                 The classical era of management, which emphasized personal economic needs as
                 what provides job satisfaction and motivates individuals to increase productivity,
                 was followed by the human relations era, which focused on the relationship
                 between the effects of the physical and operational work environment on employee
                 job satisfaction and productivity. In 1925, a group of engineers from the Hawthorne
                 plant of Western Electric Company in Chicago conducted a study to determine the
                 impact of changing light intensity on worker productivity. Their findings were inter-
                 esting but inconclusive: They found that when light intensity in the plant was either
                 lowered or raised, output increased. To explain this effect, the Hawthorne engineers
                 requested Harvard professor Elton Mayo and a team of his colleagues to examine
                 the findings. Between 1927 and 1932, Mayo and his colleagues conducted two stud-
                 ies. The first study was to evaluate the Hawthorne Studies, and the second was to  Hawthorne Studies Studies conducted
                 determine the effect of elements of the work environment, such as job redesign,  by a group of engineers at the
                                                                                           Hawthorne plant of Western Electric
                 length of workday or workweek, length of break time, and the piece-rate system, on
                                                                                           Company in Chicago in 1925 to
                 increasing the output of groups of workers. The results of the studies were aston-  determine the impact of changing light
                 ishing, since they indicated that productivity increases were closely related to  intensity on worker productivity
                 employee feelings. In both the lighting case and the job redesign case, employees
                 felt that special attention was being given to them, and this encouraged them to  Hawthorne effect The principle that
                 perform better and to increase productivity. In cases where employees were given  when employees are given autonomy to
                 greater autonomy to control their work environment, they became even more  control their work environment, they
                                                                                           become more motivated, and this has a
                 motivated. These findings led to the development of the Hawthorne effect, which
                                                                                           positive impact on employee morale, job
                 recognizes the important role that the work environment plays in job satisfaction,  satisfaction, and productivity

                 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266