Page 267 - Introduction to Business
P. 267

CHAPTER 7    Motivating and Leading Employees  241


                 1. Relationship between an employee’s effort and performance. The employee’s
                    expectation is that a certain amount of effort will result in the desired
                    performance.
                 2. Relationship between employee performance and firm’s rewards. This is a
                    tricky relationship, since a firm’s conditions for providing the reward could be
                    opaque, making the employee’s outcome uncertain.
                 3. Relationship between a firm’s reward and an employee’s goals. The
                    expectations are clear, since the employee anticipates achieving his or her
                    goals soon after receiving the reward.
                    Expectancy theory helps explain why employees in certain countries of the for-
                 mer Soviet bloc did not work hard. Since all employees were paid almost the same
                 and salary increases were based on years of service, there was little motivation to
                 work hard. Expectancy theory does provide managers with ideas of how to motivate
                 employees. For example, making employee performance requirements clear and
                 attainable, linking rewards to performance in a transparent manner, and tying
                 rewards to employee goals will enable employees to respond appropriately—
                 through increased productivity. When employers enforce a piece-rate compensa-
                 tion system, they are inadvertently practicing expectancy theory.

                 Equity Theory
                 Equity theory is something that most of us are familiar with in our day-to-day lives.
                 Equity at the corporate level means fairness, justice, or evenhandedness in the
                 workplace. All of us like to be treated in a fair manner at work, school, and play and
                 in stores and restaurants. In countries such as the United States, the United King-
                 dom, France, Germany, South Africa, India, Sri Lanka, and so on, which have
                 diverse populations, equity theory plays an extremely important role in employee
                 satisfaction, motivation, and productivity. A major economic strength of these
                 countries is the diversity, primarily in race, religion, and class or caste, of their pop-
                 ulations and workforce. Unless all employees are treated fairly, employee morale
                 will be low and the firm may face legal action. Literally thousands of lawsuits have
                 been filed and won in the United States because employees were not treated equi-
                 tably by their employers.
                    Equity theory states that employees are motivated to work smart and con-  equity theory The theory that employees
                 tribute to a firm’s success as long as they believe that they are treated and compen-  are motivated to work smart and
                                                                                          contribute to the success of the firm as
                 sated fairly relative to others with similar, not identical, levels of education and
                                                                                          long as they believe that they are
                 professional experience. How do employees determine whether they are being  treated and compensated fairly relative
                 treated in an equitable manner? Employees first try to decide whether the employer  to others with similar levels of
                 rewards them in proportion to their input. Some of the major rewards they consider  education and professional experience
                 are wages, benefits, promotion, and awards—called  outcomes. Employees then
                 consider what they provide to the company in terms of hours worked, educational
                 level, professional experience, and skills—called inputs. The employees compute
                 the outcomes-to-inputs ratio to determine if they are being fairly treated by
                 the company. The question then becomes “With whom do employees compare
                 themselves?”
                    Employees generally do this in a stepwise manner. First, they try to compare
                 themselves with employees of similar background within the organization. Second,
                 they try to compare themselves with employees with similar background outside the
                 organization but in a similar line of business. Finally, they compare now to their past
                 experience with another company. After making these comparisons, if they find the
                 outcomes-to-inputs ratios to be somewhat similar, they will feel that the treatment is
                 fair and equitable and they will leave things alone. However, if they conclude that


                 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272