Page 24 - CCFA Journal - 8th Issue
P. 24

风险控制 Risk Management                             加中金融


    Basel IV Changes for Real Estate Exposures

    Under  Basel  IV,  the  risk  sensitivity  for  real  estate  secured  most  by  this  change  and  are  likely  to  pass  on  the  increased
    exposures  has  been  greatly  enhanced  under  the  standardized  capital costs to borrowers for commercial mortgages.
                                                   6
    approach, directly impacting the standardized banks . Although
              7
    AIRB Banks  are still allowed to use internal model approach to
    calculate RWA, as mentioned previously, they are more likely to   巴塞尔协议 IV 对房地产风险敞口的变化
    be  subject  to  a  RWA  floor  which  is  calculated  based  on
    standardized  risk  weightings.  The  increased  risk  sensitivity   在巴塞尔协议 IV 下,标准化方法下房地产担保敞口的风险
    under standardized approach mainly manifests in more granular   敏感性大大提高,直接影响标准化银行。尽管  AIRB  银行
    risk  weightings  and  the  differentiated  treatment  for  income   仍被允许使用内部模型方法来计算 RWA,但如前所述,它
    producing    vs    non-income     producing    properties.   们更有可能受到基于标准化风险权重计算的  RWA  下限的
    Correspondingly,  under  IRB  approach,  the  correlation    约束。标准化方法下风险敏感性的提高主要体现在更细化
    parameter  has  also  been  recalibrated  to  reflect  the  risk  of   的风险权重以及对创收与非创收财产的区别对待。相应地,
    mortgages  associated  with  income  producing  properties  and   在  IRB  方法下,相关参数也已重新校准,以反映与创收财
    those that do not meet OSFI’s expectation related to OSFI B-20   产相关的抵押贷款风险以及不符合 OSFI 与 OSFI B-20 指南
             8
    guidelines .                                                 相关的预期的抵押贷款风险。
       1.  Increased  Standardized  Risk  Weight  for  Income
           Producing Properties
                                                                 1.  增加创收资产的标准化风险权重
    Basel IV standardized risk weights for real estate exposures are
    differentiated by property type (commercial vs residential), the   巴塞尔协议 IV 房地产风险敞口的标准化风险权重按房地产
    purpose  of  the  real  estate  property  (income  producing  vs   类型(商业与住宅)、房地产的用途(创收与一般)和贷
    general)  and  the  loan  to  value  ratio  (Table  2  below).  Income   款与价值比率(下表  2)进行区分。与巴塞尔协议 II 相比,
    producing property, given heavier risk weight compared to both   用于创收物业风险权重更大,被定义为“当偿还贷款的前
    those under Base II and for general purpose property, is defined   景在很大程度上取决于为贷款提供担保的财产产生的现金
    as  “When  the  prospects  for  servicing  the  loan  materially   流量,而不是潜在的借款人从其他来源偿还债务的能
    depend on the cash flows generated by the property securing   力……”。更具体地说,“……如果在机构评估其偿还贷款能
    the loan rather than on the underlying capacity of the borrower   力时所使用的借款人收入的 50% 以上来自住宅物业产生的
    to  service  the  debt  from  other  sources…”.  More  specifically,   现金流,则该贷款应被视为具有重大依赖性。机构也可以
    “…A  loan  should  be  considered  materially  dependent  if  more
    than  50%  of  the  income  from  the  borrower  used  in  the   将使用其内部物业用途指标确定的所有投资或出租物业归
    institution's assessment of its ability to service the loan is from   类为创收并受制于表  11  中的风险权重,前提是可以应
    cash  flows  generated  by  the  residential  property.  Institutions   OSFI  的要求显示其投资和出租物业的内部政策,要求该机
    may alternatively categorize all investment or rental properties,   构将不到 50% 的财产总收入用于评估借款人偿还贷款的能
    as identified using their internal property purpose indicators, as   力。”总之,创收物业是投资或出租物业的一个子集。鉴
    income producing and subject to the risk-weights in Table 11,   于上述情况,我们预计银行将收紧对创收物业的贷款政策,
    provided that their internal policies for investment and rental   不仅是因为资本成本上升,而且是为了维持这一“创收”产
    properties can be shown, at OSFI's request, to require that less   品部门的运营成本。
    than 50% of the gross income from the property be used in the
    institution's assessment of the borrower's ability to service the   另一方面,商业房地产抵押贷款(商业抵押贷款)过去根
    loan.”  In summary, income producing properties make a subset   据借款人是个人、小企业还是公司而获得 75% 或 100% 的
    of investment or rental properties. From the above, we expect   风险权重,将受到一系列风险权重的影响贷款价值比。受
    banks  to  tighten  their  lending  policies  for  income  producing   影响最大的部分是个人或小型企业借款人,其风险权重将
    properties, not only for the elevated capital cost but also the   从 75% 增加到 90% 或 110%,除非 LTV(贷款价值比)小
    operational costs to maintain this “income producing” product   于或等于 50%。标准化银行(未经 OSFI 批准使用 AIRB 方
    segment.                                                     法计算信用风险  RWA  的银行)受此变化影响最大,并可
                                                                 能将增加的资本成本转嫁给借款人进行商业抵押贷款。
    On  the  other  hand,  commercial  real  estate  secured  loans
    (commercial  mortgages)  which  used  to  receive  either  75%  or
    100%  risk  weight  depending  on  whether  the  borrower  is  an
    individual, small business or corporation, will be subject to an
    array  of  risk  weights  based  on  loan  to  value  ratio.  The  most
    impacted segment is individual or small business borrowers for
    whom the risk weight will increase from 75% to 90% or 110%
    unless  the  LTV  (Loan  to  Value  ratio)  is  less  or  equal  to  50%.
    Standardized banks (banks who are not approved by OSFI to use
    AIRB approach to calculate credit risk RWA) are impacted the


    6  Banks who use the standardized approach to calculate RWA for
    credit risk.
    7  Banks who received OSFI approval to use Advanced Internal Rating
    Based Approach to calculate RWA for credit risk
    8  Final Revised Guideline B-20: Residential Mortgage Underwriting
    Practices and Procedures
                                           CCFA JOURNAL OF FINANCE   August 2022
     Page 24     第24页
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29