Page 269 - AAA Integrated Workbook STUDENT S18-J19
P. 269

INT syllabus: Audit of performance information in the public sector






                           Usefulness, measurability, reliability




               3.1 Usefulness

               Performance information is now more commonplace with the introduction of
               government targets, league tables and measures for public sector organisations to
               demonstrate accountability to the taxpayer.

               This information is reported to the relevant regulatory authority but may also be
               published on the organisation's website and included in their annual report.

               Users can use this information to assess the performance of government
               departments or to help make choices such as which hospital to choose for treatment.


               3.2 Measurability

               Some measures may be subjective in terms of definition and as a result may be
               easily manipulated by management in order to ensure they are being seen to achieve
               the target.


               This may lead the way for some organisations to include measures which are not
               relevant to their main strategic aims but which have been included to make it appear
               as though the organisation has achieved something.

               There is a risk that organisations are deliberately vague when composing
               performance measures so that they can claim to have met their target.

               For these reasons, measurement of the target may be difficult and therefore difficult
               for the auditor to prove or disprove.

               Whilst there are national performance measures in place which all organisations of a
               particular type will need to report, each organisation can also determine their own
               performance objectives they wish to measure. This inconsistency means
               comparisons cannot be drawn between different entities and may cause confusion
               for users of the performance information who see that different criteria are being
               used to assess the same information.
















                                                                                                     265
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274