Page 13 - MCOM MODEL ANSWER 1
P. 13

P a g e  | 13

               analysis valued this option at US$12,955. With our 51% valued at S$6909m, this raises the EV
               of Strategy 1 to S$83,989m


               Strategy 2: Stay the course


               This presents similar considerations as the first except that we remain a 49% 'minority', do not
               have  to  raise  finance  and  face  a  different  quantum  of  outcomes.  Appendix  7  values  the
               dividends  and  hence  our  holding  at  S$90,985m.  Furthermore  there  is  an  embedded  put/sell

               option for S$28,000m in 2018 valued at S$49m. This is quite interesting as it kicks in only after
               we  would  have  known  whether  Ilania  has  complied  for  sanctions  to  ease. The  Decision  tree

               therefore  shows  that  the  70%  chance  of  compliance  delivers  S$90,985m  with  an  EV  of
               S$63,690m meanwhile the 30% chance of non compliance allows us to 'Put' our 49% stake for
               S$28,000m giving a discounted EV of S$6,352m. These combine with the  optimistic chance to

               give an EV of S$70,042m which when added to this Put Value of S$49m delivers S$70,098m as
               overall EV.


               Strategy 3: Sell-off & walk away

               Offer 1 -Advantages:
                 It is an outright cash offer of S$73,018m and could simply be used to pay the S$58,000m

                   Nakolia  fine  and  remove  the  damage  to  our  group  capital  structure  and  the  balance
                   S$15,018m  interestingly  will  just  about  compensate  for  the  forfeit  of  the  held-up  2014
                   dividends  of  S$4,210m  +  loan  of  S$5,800m  and  the  2015-recently  declared  dividend  of

                   S$5,008m.
                 It protects us from the ethical risks and legal uncertainties and liabilities that could flow from
                   the personal data violation case that is about to reach the courts.


               Offer 1 -Disadvantages

                 It undervalues our 49% holding by up to  25% (S$90,985m-73,018/73,018).
                 Payment is by credit to our bank account in Ilania which still leaves us still with the challenge

                   of physically retrieving it for use.
                 This offer is from Bartini who also competes with us in Africa and is also one of the 7 license

                   holders  in  Chininsia  where  we  are  bidding.  We  share  very  similar  emerging  market
                   ambitions so selling to them in the Middle East would be a strategic blunder as it would not
                   only see us capitulate on our Middle East ambition but it will actually embolden Bartini to

                   make even more aggressive strategic moves in our Sub Saharan Africa strongholds.

                                                       Developed by The CharterQuest Institute for 'The CFO Business Case Study Competition 2016'
                                                                          www.charterquest.co.za | Email: thecfo@charterquest.co.za
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18