Page 180 - Microsoft Word - 00 P1 IW Prelims.docx
P. 180

Chapter 16





                           The contextual features of change





               Balogun and Hope Hailey suggest that there are a number of contextual features that
               should be considered before an implementation approach (for example a style of
               leadership) for the change is determined:


               Contextual feature         E.g. participative vs coercive approaches

                    time                 A coercive approach is needed when time is short (and vice
                                          versa – which applies to all of these contextual features)

                    scope                A participative approach is best when the scope is small
                                          and has little strategic impact

                    preservation         A participative approach is best when staff are hard to
                                          replace


                    diversity            A participative approach is best suited to situations where
                                          few staff types are impacted

                    capability           A participative approach can be used when staff are good
                                          decision makers


                    capacity             If staff have had experience of successful past changes
                                          then a participative approach can be used


                    readiness            If change is unexpected a more coercive approach may be
                                          needed


                    power                If staff hold lot of power a participative approach will be
                                          needed
























               174
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182