Page 65 - MY STORY
P. 65

I made contact with the manager of QA and told him that I

               had  the  authority  to  approve  the  return  of  the  plate  to
               TIMET, only if  it  was  indeed  defective.  On  the  other
               hand, if there was no defect, the rejection would not be

               approved and NAA would have to keep the plate.

               “No problem,” the QA manager said, “we definitely saw

               defect  indications  in  the  plates  and  have  marked  those
               locations carefully.”  I told him I would be in-plant that
               same day to review their findings.


               After  reviewing  their  ultrasonic  scan  records,  and  the

               condition of plate, I was pretty well convinced that their
               “defects” were merely indications of a change in grain
               flow pattern and I offered NAA QA folk a challenge.  I
               said “If you’re so darned sure this is a defect why don’t

               you cut open the plate at the marked location(s).  If just
               one defect shows up on any plate, I’ll authorize the return

               of  the  all  the  plate  for  full  credit.  If  the  metal  is
               defect-free, the plate belongs to NAA, and you’ll tell your
               buyer to cancel the rejection request.”


               They were so sure of their ultrasonic inspection capability
               that  they  agreed  to  the  offer,  and  when  the  plate  was

               sliced open – well, there was no defect – just good solid
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70