Page 10 - John Hundley 2009
P. 10

Federal Bills Stall


                             In Washington, mortgage reform in bankruptcy has stalled, but may not yet be dead.
                          Sen.  Dick  Durbin’s  bill  (S.  61,  see  Sharp  Thinking  #16,  Jan.  2009),  sponsored  in  the
                          House  by  Judiciary  Chair  John  Conyers  (H.R.  200),  was  amended  in  that  body  and
                          reported  to  the  floor,  but  days  later  Conyers  introduced  a  separate,  broader  bill  (H.R.
                          1106), which the House adopted in March.
                             The H.R. 200 amendments generally limited mortgage reformation in bankruptcy to
                          debtors who had tried to obtain voluntary modifications first; limited reformation to loans
        made prior to passage of the proposal; required that the court find that the debtor had not received the
        underlying mortgage by  fraud;  permitted the court to modify subordinate claims as  well as mortgages;
        narrowed the circumstances under which “truth in lending” counterclaims could be asserted; changed the
        base for modified interest rates; and required that if a debtor sold the home before completing the Chapter
        13 plan and received more than the debt remaining, portions of the forgiven debt had to be repaid.
            H.R. 1106 generally retained those changes; added a provision that the value of the secured claim
        be as of the date the court ruled; defined circumstances where modification could not be sought in good
        faith; and added a provision permitting interest rate reduction (no change in principal)
        where the resulting monthly payment would be consistent with the  Administration’s
        Homeowner Affordability & Stability Plan and the debtor could pay off the loan over
        30 years.  However, it also addressed a host of issues not raised in H.R. 200, such
        as changes in statutes governing FHA, VA and rural housing mortgages; establish-
        ment of a Mortgage Fraud Task Force in the Department of Justice; and “safe harbor”
        rules for mortgage servicers who agree to modifications.     Those changes sought to
        harmonize  the  bankruptcy  reforms  with,  and  in  some  instances  to  legislatively
        implement, the Obama plan, which seeks to halt foreclosures outside of bankruptcy
        by encouraging voluntary mortgage modifications (see Sharp Thinking #17, Feb. 2009).            Durbin
            In a widely-publicized confrontation, Durbin on April 30 offered much of H.R. 1106, in a refined
        form, as an amendment to S. 896, a bill on mortgage-modification sponsored by Sen. Chris Dodd.
        That effort failed, causing Durbin’s widely-reported charge that banks “own the Senate”.   Probably that
        defeat spells the death knell for mortgage modification in bankruptcy, but perhaps not.  As shown above,
        the legislation has been an evolving animal, as proponents attempt to deal with critics’ objections.  More-
        over, advocates  charge that  the  President really  did not try to get Durbin’s amendment passed, and it
        appears that success of his out-of-bankruptcy mortgage reform plan is key to his efforts in this area.
            A  particularly  thorny  issue  in  this  respect  is  how  one  gives  mortgage  servicers  the  right  to  modify
        mortgages they do not own.  Many mortgages have been wrapped up in pools and sold off to permanent
        investors; ownership of many others has been financed through mortgage-backed derivatives.  How such
        mortgages can be modified without rewriting pool arrangements,  and without making even less
        valuable  the derivative  instruments  which started  the  banking meltdown  last  summer,  is  highly
        problematic.  The extent to which such problems can be overcome through the voluntary program plainly
        affects the scope of the bankruptcy-modification the Administration may desire.

        -- John Hundley, Jhundley@lotsharp.com, with Linda Kennedy, Linda@lotsharp.com.
                                                                                                        John\Sharp Thinking\#20.doc
        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                            THE SHARP LAW FIRM, P.C.

                    1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                            Arbitration • White Collar Criminal Defense • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

              Terry Sharp: law@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; David J. Grindle, Dgrindle@lotsharp.com;
                 Mandy Combs: Mcombs@lotsharp.com; Real Estate Closing and Title Services, see www.sharptitleservices.com.

                                                        Advertising Material
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15