Page 9 - John Hundley 2009
P. 9

Sharp                                        Thinking







        No. 20                         Perspectives on Developments in the Law from The Sharp Law Firm, P.C.                     May 2009
        While Federal Proposals Stall . . .
                Illinois Enacts Mortgage Reform Law



            Mortgage forbearance and reform legislation has stalled in Congress (see p. 2), but Illinois has moved
        ahead with its own enactment in that area.
            P.A. 95-1046 amends the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq.) to require
        opportunities for credit counseling and negotiation of a “sustainable loan workout
        plan” for home mortgages where the mortgagor is not in bankruptcy.

            Effective  April  6,  and  running  until  April  2011,  P.A.  95-1046  prevents
        foreclosures  on  delinquent  home  mortgages  unless  the  homeowner  has
        filed  for  bankruptcy  or  several  preliminary  steps  have  been  taken  first  –
        which steps create a substantial delay.  First, the mortgagee must mail the mort-
        gagor a notice, in substantially the form set forth in the act, advising that the mort-
        gagor may consult a housing counselor.      The notice is to be mailed to a mort-
        gagor “delinquent by more than 30 days”, which seems to (a) prevent foreclosure
        for non-financial defaults (“delinquent” is defined as having a payment past due) and (b) mean that one
        must wait 30 days after the account becomes delinquent before one can mail the notice.
            The notice then creates a 30-day period for the mortgagor to consult with a counselor.  If, within
        those 30 days, a recognized housing counselor gives notice that the mortgagor is  seeking its services,
        foreclosure  filing  is  stayed  another  30  days.  During  those  30  days,  a  “sustainable  loan  workout
        plan” may be proposed to the mortgagee, and the mortgagee is prevented from initiating foreclosure
        until it has decided whether to accept that plan.  If the plan is accepted, foreclosure cannot be initiated for
        so long as the mortgagor is in compliance with the plan.
                                 P.A. 95-1046 defines a sustainable loan workout plan as one that the mortgagor
                             and counselor “believe” will enable the mortgagor to “stay current” on his or her pay-
                             ments for the foreseeable future, taking “into account the [mortgagor’s] income and
                             existing and foreseeable debts.”  “Stay current” is not defined, but does not refer to
                             existing mortgage terms because such a plan expressly may include a suspension of
                             payments, a lengthened term, a lower or frozen interest rate, a principal write-down,
                             deferred payments, or a complete refinancing, among other suggestions.  The bene-
                             fits of the amendments cannot be waived, but the process can be used only once.
            The effect is that a debtor can gain a forbearance of up to 90 days regardless of whether any
        realistic workout plan is forthcoming or possible.  P.A. 95-1046 does not appear to limit mortgagees’
        discretion in rejecting such plans, but to recover damages against counselors for engaging in meritless or
        unacceptable workout proposals one must show willful or wanton misconduct.  The lesson for lenders
        would seem to be that one should start the process under the act sooner rather than later.  If the
        initial notice letter is sent, nothing prevents the debtor from bringing the account current while the clock is
        running on the other steps.  However, if one delays, the time lost cannot be recaptured.


        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
        Sharp  Thinking  is  an  occasional  newsletter  of  The  Sharp  Law  Firm,  P.C.  addressing  developments  in  the  law  which  may  be  of  interest.    Nothing  contained  in  Sharp
        Thinking  shall  be  construed  to  create  an  attorney-client  relation  where  none  previously  has  existed,  nor  with  respect  to  any  particular  matter.   The  perspectives  herein
        constitute educational material on general legal topics and are not legal advice applicable to any particular situation.  To establish an attorney-client relation or to obtain legal
        advice on your particular situation, contact a Sharp lawyer at the phone number at one of the addresses provided on page 2 of this newsletter.
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14