Page 174 - The Track Of The Jew Through The Ages - Alfred Rosenberg
P. 174

The Track of the Jew through the Ages

              And the Jewish historian, M. Kayserling, rises to a eulogy
      in calling the Talmud "the greatest work admired for thousands of
                                                              364
      years, and the likes of which is not to be found in any literature".
       So think all Hebrews.
              There has hardly been a more tolerant man, hardly one who
      was so inclined to blur and deny the individual differences in the
      character of peoples, than Tolstoy. With endless repetitions he
      preached (that is, in his letters) the similarity of thought in China,
      India, Judaea, Europe.
              But after he left his airy castle built on the dogma of the
      equality of men, and observed more closely the works of man, the
      great man came however to other results. In the study of the New
       Testament, he reports, he felt like a pearl-fisher who throws his net
      for precious mussels but draws with them at the same time slime
      and dirt from which he had to first release the former. "And so 1
                                                               365
      found next to a pure Christian spirit an alien dirty Jewish spirit".
              Schiller felt great reverence for many figures of the Old
      Testament, that is, for the personality of Moses, but he already
       differentiates with a sure instinct (without a closer knowledge of
      the actual contexts) between the "unworthiness and reprehensibility
      of the nation" and the "merit of their law-givers". He calls the Jew
      an "impure and base vessel" in which however something precious
      was preserved which could later ripen "in brighter minds", an
      "impure canal" through which the most noble of our possessions,
      the truth, was conducted, which however broke once   it had
                                   366
      performed that which it had to".
              Goethe said that the contrast between the present-day Jews
      and their "forebears annoys us". Both the great men therefore have
      a markedly contradictory attitude towards the Jewish past.
              But this must be dispelled when, as we know today, the
      great men of the Hebrew past were not at all the forebears of the


       364
        Sephardim, Leipzig, 1859, p.86.
       365  Kurze Darlegung des Evangeliums [A Short Exposition of the Gospel,  1 881].
       m
        Die Sendung Moses. [Schiller's lecture on the origins of the Jewish religion was
      delivered at the University of Jena in 1789 and published in Schiller's journal
      Thalia in 1790.]
                                                              151
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179