Page 8 - Carrier Recombination Activity and Structural Properties of Small-Angle Grain Boundaries in Multicrystalline Silicon
P. 8

Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, No. 10A (2007)                                       J. CHEN and T. SEKIGUCHI

                                      SE                  EBSD               EBIC_300 K
                             (a)                   (b)                  (c)


                                                        4.5°        6°

                                                             <1°    2°

                                                  2.5°   1.5°       Σ3
                                                                                      200 µm



                                            (d)























                 Fig. 9. SE, EBSD, and room temperature EBIC images (a–c) of SA-GBs in mc-Si with Fe contamination at 1000 C followed by
                    air cooling. The changes in dislocation distance and EBIC contrast of contaminated SA-GBs with respect to the tilt angle are plotted
                    in (d).

          dislocations at a smaller tilt angle and by boundary  contamination levels. 10)  Adding the results of SA-GBs, the
          reconstruction at a larger tilt angle.              classification table is updated and shown in Fig. 10. The
                                                              amount of contamination was categorized into four levles:


          3.3  Effect of Fe contamination on SA-GBs            clean, light (annealing at 800 C), moderate (900–1000 C),

            Figures 9(a)–9(c) shows SE, EBSD, and EBIC images,  and heavy (1100 C). In the clean mc-Si, the EBIC contrast
          respectively, of a mc-Si sample with moderate Fe contam-  of SA-GBs varied from 0 to 30%, while that of LA-GBs was

          ination induced by 1000 C annealing. SA-GBs with tilt  less than 2%. In the Fe-contaminated mc-Si, the EBIC

          angles from <1 to 6 exist in this sample. In the EBIC image  contrast of both SA- and LA-GBs increased. At each


          taken at 300 K, all the SA-GBs except for SA <1 were  contamination level, SA-GBs (except SA <1 ) always
          observed as dark lines with strong EBIC contrast of about  showed stronger EBIC contrast than LA-GBs, indicating

          25–40%. SA <1 showed relatively weak contrast (<10%).  that the SA-GBs are much more effective gettering sites for
          The above results suggest that the SA-GBs become electri-  Fe atoms than the LA-GBs. The high density dislocations at
          cally active after Fe contamination and the predominant  SA-GBs act as strong gettering sites. In contrast, the smooth
          defect energy levels change from shallow to deep. The  boundaries of LA-GBs (particularly 3) are well recon-
          variation of 300 K EBIC contrast reflects the gettering ability  structed and there are fewer defects acting as impurity
          of impurities. The changes in dislocation distance and EBIC  gettering sites.
          contrast with respect to the tilt angle of SA-GBs are plotted
          in Fig. 9(d). The distance is calculated from the dislocation  3.4  Effect of H passivation on SA-GBs
          model. The EBIC contrast is plotted using experimental  Figure 11 shows EBIC images of SA-GBs in clean mc-Si
          data. It is clear that the EBIC contrast is strongly related to  before and after H passivation. In the as-grown state, some
          the distance between boundary dislocations and becomes  SA-GBs already show strong contrast (5–15%) at 300 K and


          saturated from 1.5 . For SA <1 , the distance between  are denoted as ‘‘strong SA’’, while others with no obvious
          boundary dislocations is sufficiently large for each to be  contrast at 300 K are denoted as ‘‘weak SA’’. At 100 K, all

          treated as an individual dislocation, while for SA >1 , the  the SA-GBs showed strong EBIC contrast. The intragranular
          dislocations tend to become closely spaced. The latter may  defects also became visible at 100 K.
          have much greater ability at gettering impurity atoms.  After H passivation, the EBIC image at 300 K [Fig. 11(b)]
            In the previous paper, we established a classification table  did not change significantly except that the contrast of the
          determining the EBIC contrast of LA-GBs with for Fe  strong SA was reduced slightly. However, the EBIC image
                                                           6495
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10