Page 92 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 92

Hernia

           registries might further inform surgical decision-making on  Key questions
           this crucial issue.
                                                              KQ21.f In patients with intestinal incarceration without
           Key questions                                      signs of intestinal strangulation or concurrent bowel
                                                              resection (i.e., a clean surgical field) is mesh-based repair
           KQ 21.e What is the optimal surgical approach for an  recommended? Which mesh?
           acutely incarcerated/strangulated groin hernia?
























           Evidence in literature                             Evidence in literature
           No randomized studies, systematic reviews, or comparative  One low-quality cohort study compared open anterior
           cohort studies address the question which approach is best.  polypropylene mesh repair with open anterior repair (ana-
           Only one low-quality randomized trial compares a mesh-  tomic repair, modified Bassini) without mesh. 319  The
           based open posterior approach with a mesh-based open  majority of patients had intestinal incarceration without
           anterior approach and found no differences except for an  intestinal strangulation or concurrent bowel resection (i.e.,
           increased incidence of second incisions in the anterior  a clean surgical field). No inter-group differences were
           approach group. A preperitoneal approach was judged to be  found in wound infection rates or postoperative compli-
           as safe as an anterior Lichtenstein approach in incarcerated/  cations. No mesh-related problems were reported.
           strangulated groin hernia repairs. 316               Another low-quality cohort study compared Lichten-
             A very low-quality comparative cohort study recom-  stein repairs in incarcerated versus elective IH patients and
           mends a preperitoneal approach. 317                found no inter-group differences. Most patients had clean
             No randomized studies or systematic reviews focus on  surgical fields and were ASA class I and II. 320
           TAPP or TEP repair techniques in patients with incarcer-  One low-quality randomized trial compared Lichten-
           ated/strangulated groin hernias. Only one low-quality  stein with Bassini repairs in selected clean (no peritonitis,
           comparative cohort study showed that TAPP repair is  inflammatory hernias, or bowel resections) incarcerated
           useful in elective and emergent cases such as those  groin hernia patients. In this study, the Lichtenstein repair
           involving strangulated hernias in selected patients (those  was found to be safe and effective with an acceptable low
           with scrotal hernias, previous pelvic or abdominal surgery,  rate of postoperative complications and no recurrences. 321
           and  severe  cardiac  or  pulmonary  problems  were  All studies cited used polypropylene mesh. No data were
           excluded). 318                                     found on absorbable mesh or biologic implants.


           Discussion                                         Discussion
           The optimal technique for acutely incarcerated/strangu-  In spite of low-quality medical evidence, the statement
           lated IH repair remains an open issue, unknowable from the  above received a strong grade, since benefits outweigh
           present literature. Well-conducted RCTs and other studies  risks when mesh is used in emergent clean hernia opera-
           are needed to provide answers to the KQs posed above.  tions. This is similar to the elective surgery experience.
                                                              Definitive research is needed on this subject.




           123
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97