Page 87 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 87

Hernia
















             If the primary repair was a tissue repair, then either the  provides optimal outcomes while reducing the incidence of
           anterior or posterior—either open or endoscopic—ap-  chronic pain and allowing earlier return-to-work or physi-
           proach can be used for the recurrent hernia repair. If the  cal activity. 299
           primary repair was a mesh repair, then the entrance point  Once an anterior repair has been done, an endoscopic
           should be via a space not previously entered.      repair will generally go through nearly undisturbed tissue
             For non-endoscopic surgeons, an anterior Lichtenstein  planes, permitting relative ease of dissection. One study
           approach has been recommended after a primary tissue  has demonstrated that the rate of recurrence of primary and
           repair. 12  Care must be taken to prevent any potential (ad-  recurrent IHs is similar. 285  This likely depends on local
           ditional) damage to testicular vessels, since this may result  expertise in part. It has been demonstrated that endoscopic
           in testicular atrophy. 292  According to one study, incidental  repair after an anterior repair generally takes longer than a
           femoral hernias occur in up to 9% of recurrent IH patients. 7  primary  repair  and  increases  the  peritoneal  tear
           Therefore, groin exploration must include the femoral  incidence. 300
           region.                                              A 2014 meta-analysis summarized findings from six
             When laparoendoscopic surgery is not an option, the  RCTs and 5 other studies comparing laparoscopic to open
           open posterior approach represents an acceptable alterna-  procedures in recurrent IH repair. The analysis of 1311
               293, 294
           tive.     This approach involves placing a large mesh  patients demonstrated that laparoscopy was associated with
           piece posterior to the transversalis fascia via a trans-in-  a lower incidence of wound infection and a shorter sick
           guinal incision (Rives), or a muscle-splitting incision  leave without an increase in operation time. 301
           (Kugel and Wantz) or a lower midline incision (Stoppa). 295  While nationwide data on recurrence rates have
           A report of 58 Stoppa operations for recurrence reported an  remained disappointing high, there is evidence to suggest
           overall rerecurrence rate of 12%. 296  Nearly two-thirds of  that in highly specialized hernia centers, rerecurrence rates
           these occurred in the first few years after the technique was  of less than 2% can be achieved. For instance, a large
           introduced at the study site. Further experience with the  institutional review reported a 2% rerecurrence rate after
           technique halved the rerecurrence rate in the same study.  TAPP. 83  Yet, another study of over 8000 patients found
                                     R
             The Prolene Hernia System operation involves mesh  nearly identical rerecurrence rates of 1.1% for both primary
           leaflet placements anterior and posterior to the transversalis  and recurrent hernia repairs. 302
                297, 298
           fascia.     A connector holds the leaflets together. This  A Swedish Hernia Register study of 850 recurrent IHs
           technique requires a preperitoneal dissection via the ante-  showed that posterior mesh repair (PMR)—either endo-
           rior approach, difficult if the patient has already undergone  scopic of open preperitoneal—had a lower second recur-
           a posterior approach either laparoscopic or open during  rence rate versus anterior mesh repair (AMR) (5.6 vs 11%,
           primary repair. In addition, any prior anterior intervention  p = 0.025). 303  An increased risk [3.21 (CI 1.33–7.44)
           would cause scarring, resulting in distorted tissue planes  (p = 0.009)] of a second recurrence was seen after anterior
           and increasing risk of testicular atrophy and nerve damage.  primary repair followed by AMR, and a decreased risk
             Since the potential for complications of open recurrent  [p = 0.08 (CI 0.01–0.94)] (p = 0.45) after PMR followed
           IH repair—including testicular atrophy and/or nerve  by AMR. 303
           entrapment and damage—is higher than for primary repair,  Surgical options for patients with recurrence after TEP/
           we strongly suggest that this operation be performed by an  TAPP
           expert hernia surgeon.
           Surgical options for patients with recurrence after anterior  Key question
           repair
             A 2016 study provided strong evidence that endoscopic  KQ20.d What is the best operation for a recurrence after
           recurrent hernia repair (TEP or TAPP) after anterior repair  TEP/TAPP?




                                                                                                      123
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92