Page 43 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 43

30             SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  THE  ORION
           in  our  present  inquiry  except  the  fact  that  the  enumeration  of
           the  deities  presiding  over  the  various  Nak~hatras  begins  with·
           Agni,  the presiding deity  of the  KpttikAs. •  From these  data as-
           tronomers have calculated that  the  solstitial  colure  occupied  the
           position  above  mentioned  between  1269  B.  C.  to  1181  B.  C.,
           according  as  we  take  the mean  rate of the  precession  of  the
           equinoxes 50° or 48.60 a year.t

               Some  scholars,  however,  have  boldly  raised  the  question,
           what  authority  is  there to hold that the position  of the solstitial
           colure was  recorded in the VedAnga Jyotitha from actual observa-
           tion  ? It is conceded that the position of the solstitial colure might
           have  been incorporated  in the  Jyotisha from  real  traditional in-
           formation,  but it is at the same tilDe ~ntended that the language
           of the treatise and the methods given therein create doubts about
           the antiquity claimed for the work on the strength of the position
           of the  solstitial  points  given  therein. '' I feel  bound to remark ",
           says Prof.  Max Mt1ller,  "that unless  there  was  internal  evidence
           that the Vedic  hymns  reached back to that remote antiquity this
           passage in theJyoti~ha would by itself carry no weight whatever." t
           The  existence  of the  different  versions  of the  VedAnga  Jyoti~ha
           and the obscurity into which some of its verses are still shrouded
            render it rather difficult to meet the above objection, especially as
           it is a  side attack on the antiquity of the work with an admission
           that the position  of the colure  might have  been recorded  in the
           work from real traditions  current in the  time of its· author. It is,
           however,  needless  to answer  this  objection,  inasmuch  as  there  is
           ample confirmatory evidence in the Vedic works themselves which
           not  only  bears  out  tile  statement  in  the  VedAnga  Jyoti•ha,  but
           takes  us  back  into  still  remoter  antiquity.

               There are many passages in the Taittirtya S&IJlhita, the Taittirtya
           Br&hmapa  and  other works  where  the  KpttikAs  occupy  the  first


               •  Cf.  Ved.  ]y. Verse 25. atftf:  srarrmt;  ~ etc.
               t  See the late  Krish~shlstrl Go:1bole's  Essay on the Antiquity of
           the Vedas,  p.  x8;  also  Pref. to \tig., Vol. IV,  p. uviii.
               !  See  Pref. to  \tig.  Vol.  IV,  p. xxv.  The mention of  ~ for  if~1r,
           first  in  the list of ~ymbolic representa.tions  of the  Nak~h·atras  in. verse
           14, lends some  support  to  these doubts.
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48