Page 44 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 44

THE  K~ITTIKAS                   31

             place in  the  list of the  Nak,hatras. •  In the Taittirtya  Brlhma11a
             ( i.  1,  2,  I) it  is  distinctly  stated,  "  one  should  consecrate  the
             ( sacred ) fire  in  the  KrittiUs; ... the Krittik&s are the mouth of the
             Nak~hatras. "t This shows that the first place given to the K!'itti.kAs
             in the list of the Nakshtras is not accidental and  that we  mu~t at
             least suppose that the Krittikas were the "mouth of the Nak~hatras".
             in the same way  as  Vasanta  or sp~g was the ''mouth of the sea-
             sons ":t or the  Phalgun:  full moon  the ''mouth of the year. "§ The
             phrase is the same in all places and naturally enough it must be simi-
             larly interpreted. But granting that the Krittikls were the mouth of
             the  Nak~hatras in  the sense that their list always commenced with
             them, it may be asked what position we are to assign to the KJittikls
             in the  course  of the year. There were,  as I have previously shown
             two  beginnings  of the  year,  the  winter  s~lstice  and .the  vernal
             equinox;  which  of  these  two  corresponded  with  the  Kritti.kls?
             Or are they to be supposed to have coiricided with a point altogether
             different  from  these  two  ?  A  little  consideration  will  show  that
             it  is  not  difficult  to  answer  these  questions  Satisfactorily.  Th~
             present  distance  between  the  KrittiUs  and  the  summer  solstice
             is more than 30°, and ifthey ever coincided with the summer solstice
             it must have been long ago in the present cycle  of the precession
             of  the  equinoxes.  We  cannot,  therefore,  interpret  the  above
             passage  so  as  to  place the summer so1stice in the  K!'ittik&s,  unless
             we  are  prepared  to  take  back  the  composition  of the  Taittirtya
             Samhita  to  about  22,000  B.  C.,  and further suppose that all  evi·
             dence  of  the  intermediate  astronomical  observations  is  entirely
             lost,  and  the  same thing'may  be said against placing the K!'ittikAs
             in  the  autumnal  equin.ox. ~ Both  the  suggetions  in  my  opinion
             are  too  extravag<'.nt  to  deserve  any  consideration.  Nor  can  we

                •  These  together  with  the list,  will  be found in Pref. to  '-ig.  Vol.
             n·,  P·  xxxiv.  Cf.  Taitt.  Sa~.  h·,  4·  IO;  Taitt.  Br.  iii.  I.  I.  6  and  i.
             :.  I.  :! \-
                t  'f.f'U<r.l~~"l1~ I  .........  I 51i  Cff  T«r~l(. I ~: II
                t  Taitt .. Br.  i.  1.  2.  6.  ~ Cfl  'Q;~ifi ~~:1
                s Taitt ..  Sal!l.  YJi.  4·  8.  quoted  i1z_fra.
                ' '  :\ siniJlar mistake  is committed by  the late KrishJ).ll  ShAstri GoQ-
             bole,  in  his  hsay on  the  antiquity  of the  Yedas,  where  he  supposes
             :\Iri;ashira,;  t<>  be' in the  autumnal  equinox.  p.  20,  zr.   -
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49