Page 77 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 77

SAMAGllA  nLA.~- 2  •  THE  ORION

          make an ayQIIQ,  ' and then in the very next verse enumerating the
          months  commencing  with  Mlrgashtrtha,  there  is  nothing  extra-
          ordinary  in  the  supposition  that some  Hindu  astronomers  might
          have  similarly  attempted  to  reconcile  what  were  then  regarded
          as  the two  beginnings  of the  year,  by  placing  the  statements  in
          juxtaposition  and  puslUng  them to  their  logical  conclusions.  On
          the contrary,  I should  have  been surprised if the Hindu astrono-
          mers had not done so.
              But,  apart from  the  origin  of the libration theory,  I  think it
          is  clr,ar  that,  if we  accept,  that  th~- Mlrgashtrtha full-moon  was
          ever'a new-year's night, in, the sense that the winter solstice occurr-
          ed  at that time,  we are inevitably landed on an absurdity.  By  the
          ordinary  process  of reductio  ad absurdum  we  are  thus -compelled
          to  abandon  the  theory that the full-moon  in  M!rgashtnha  once
          began the year  at the winter solstice.  Native scholars and astrono-
          mers,  who  did  not realize  the  absurdity,  accepted  the  theory  of
          the libratioa of the equinous as the only possible way of  reconcil-
          ing the two  statements in their sacred  books.  We  now  know that
          the equinox cannot be placed 27 ° behind Revati; ;Unless it be either
          in the beginning of the present cycle of precession of the equinoxes
          or  about  600  years  hereafter,  and  we  should  have  no  difficulty
          in rejecting  the  premi~~es that give  us such a  conclusion.  Perhaps
          it may  be  urged  that the full-moon  night in  Mlrgashtrtha might
          have  been  called  the new-year's night in some other sense. •  Yes,
          it might  be;  but  what evidence  is  there  that any  nati'l'e  scholars
         ever  thought  of it 'l  None  that  I  know  of. There  are  only  two
          beginnings of the year known in ancient Hindu literature.  I  have

             •  The only other  explanation, 1 know of,  is  that given  by  Bentley
          in his Historical Survey of Hindu Astronomy, pp.  s-27. Bentley divides
          the zodiac  into 27  lunar  mansions,  beginning  with  Shra,·ith LhA  in  the
          winter aolstice, aa 'il!.  the  Vedlnga  Jyotitha. Then  he  divide·a  it again
         into u  tro.pi.c~l months b~gin~ing with ~~g~a. The b~gin.ning of Mlgha
         and  the  diVJSJonal  Shrav•ththl ·thus  cotnCJde  at  th1s  t1me.  Now  the
         beginning of each month must fall  back  ow.'ng  to th"  preceaa•on of the
         equinoxes; and in thus receding if the beginning of lillY month coincided
         with •Y. bed lunar  mansion,  on the  6th  lunar  day,  the  month,  aaya
         De1ltley,  wa& made to commence the year t But what authority ia  tber11
         in Dative astronomical worka for auch an elaborate and artificial  theory
         to determine the commencemeat of  the year?  Native astronomerrare
         aurely expected  to  know better  the theory on which  they commenced
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82