Page 83 - Journal of Management Inquiry, July 2018

Abreu Pederzini 337

Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. London, England:
institutional theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 4-13. Vintage Books.
Collinson, D. (2012). Prozac leadership and the limits of positive think- Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social con-
ing. Leadership, 8, 87-107. doi:10.1177/1742715011434738 struction of leadership. Human Relations, 58, 1467-1494.
Collinson, D., & Tourish, D. (2015). Teaching leadership criti- Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind.
cally: New directions for leadership pedagogy. Academy of London, England: Signal Books.
Management Learning & Education, 14, 576-594. doi:10.5465/ Kauffman, S. (2008). Reinventing the sacred. New York, NY:
amle.2014.0079 Basic Books.
De Hoogh, A. H. B., Greer, L. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Kligyte, G., & Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: Leading us into fan-
Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? An investigation tasy—The paradoxical resilience of collegiality in academic
of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team per- leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33,
formance. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 687-701. doi:10.1016/j. 157-169. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864613
leaqua.2015.01.001 Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural research interviewing. London, England: Sage.
phenomena. London, England: Penguin Books. Lacan, J. (2005). Écrits. London, England: Routledge.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011). Students at Lacan, J. (2008). My teaching. London, England: Verso.
the heart of the system. London, England: Author. Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2016). Templates and turns in qualita-
De Rue, D., & Ashford, S. (2010). Who will lead and who will fol- tive studies of strategy and management. In G. Dagnino & M.
low? A social process of leadership identity in organizations. Cinici (Eds.), Research methods for strategic management (pp.
Academy of Management Review, 35, 627-647. 137-166). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dews, P. (2012). Adorno, post-structuralism and the critique of Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more compre-
identity. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 46-65). hensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
London, England: Verso. Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London, England: leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management
Verso. Review, 56(3), 58-77. doi:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58
Espedal, B. (2015). Is managerial discretion good or bad for Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling” through. Public
organizational adaptiveness? Leadership, 11, 142-157. Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
doi:10.1177/1742715013514879 Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. New York, NY: Palgrave
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and orga- Macmillan.
nization science. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 237- MacKay, R. B., & Chia, R. (2013). Choice, chance, and unintended
298. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.875671. consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the
Flores, A. (1955). Magical realism in Spanish American fiction. rise and fall of NorthcCo Automotive. Academy of Management
Hispania, 38, 187-192. doi:10.2307/335812 Journal, 56, 208-230. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0734
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York, NY: Vintage Marginson, S. (2008). Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu
Books. and worldwide higher education. British Journal of Sociology
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, of Education, 29, 303-315. doi:10.1080/01425690801966386
777-795. doi:10.1086/448181 Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance
Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction. Oxford, of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102.
UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.2307/2392813
Freud, S. (1929). Civilization and its discontents. Buckinghamshire, Ornstein, P., & Ornstein, A. (2008). The structure and func-
UK: Chrysoma Associates. tion of unconscious fantasy in the psychoanalytic treatment
Freud, S. (2005). The interpretation of dreams. New York, NY: process. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28, 206-230. doi:10.1080/
Barnes & Noble Classics. 07351690701857029
Gabriel, Y. (1997). Meeting God: When organizational members Poole, M. S. (1989). Using paradox to build management and orga-
come face to face with the supreme leader. Human Relations, nization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562-
50, 315-342. doi:10.1023/A:1016938410023 579. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308389
Gabriel, Y. (1998). The hubris of management. Administrative Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, UK:
Theory & Praxis, 20, 257-273. Cambridge University Press.
Gabriel, Y. (2011). Psychoanalytic approaches to leadership. In A. Roh, F. (1995). Magical realism: Post-expressionism. In L. P. Zamora
Bryman (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 393- & W. B. Faris (Eds.), Magical realism: Theory, history, commu-
404). London, England: Sage. nity (pp. 15-32). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
García Márquez, G. (2014). One hundred years of solitude. New Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leader-
York, NY: Penguin Books. ship. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617-633. doi:10.1016/j.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sense- leaqua.2006.10.005
giving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Schoeneborn, D. (2016). Imagining organization through metaphor
Journal, 12, 433-448. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604 and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qual- Relations, 69, 915-945. doi:10.1177/0018726715612899
itative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Stacey, R. (1992). Managing chaos: Dynamic business strategies in
Methods, 16, 15-31. doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 an unpredictable world. London, England: Kogan Page.