Page 41 - HaMizrachi Australia Rosh HaShana Yom Kippur 5781
P. 41

ISRAEL INSIGHT          THE PEOPLE AND THE LAND




                                                                                     David M. Weinberg




                                 Curb the Imperious

                              Israeli Supreme Court






          srael’s Supreme Court has gone    The Court has found it “unreasonable”   Court refused to intervene in that
          beyond the limits of “reasonable”   that religious Jews be allowed to pray on   matter.)
      Iintervention in Israeli political and   the Temple Mount because this would
       public life with its ever-expanding scope   disturb the Arabs and require a mas-  So it may be when the Court rules on
       of super-subjective decision-making.   sive police presence. On the other hand,   the historic Jewish Nation-State law of
                                            the Court has found it “reasonable” to   2018, which was passed as a “Basic Law”
       Going back 25 years to the term of then-  allow the Women of the Wall to pray in   – meaning that it was meant as supra-
       Court President (Chief Justice) Aharon   a manner offensive to most worshippers   Court constitutional legislation. The
       Barak, the Court effectively stripped   at the Western Wall despite the distur-  Court has no right to touch this. Nev-
       Israeli law of any inherent meaning and   bance involved and the massive police   ertheless, current Chief Justice Esther
       created complete legal mayhem. Barak   presence required to make it feasible.  Hayut has convened an 11-justice panel
       and his colleagues developed a series of                                  to judge the law’s “reasonableness.”
       mumbo-jumbo, infinitely pliant con-  It was found “unreasonable” that Reli-
       cepts that allow High Court justices to   gious Zionist Jews operate “acceptance   So it may be when the Court rules soon
                                                                                 on a petition from a group of extremist
       apply their own sensibilities to issues   committees” to maintain distinctly   professors to terminate all government
       before the Court; to socially re-engineer   homogenous small communities even   funding for gender-separate Haredi col-
       Israeli society – in their enlightened   though is this basic libertarianism, not   lege programs. Accepting the petition
       image, of course.                    discrimination. But it is “reasonable”
                                            for Bedouins and Arabs to operate    would be a disaster for the slow but
       “Reasonableness” is a term that runs   “acceptance committees,” because they   measurable movement of Haredi men
       like a computer virus through the    are considered “distinct” and apparently   and women into the workforce – which
       High Court’s decisions over the past   more kosher communities by the Court.  is crucial for the Israeli economy and
       two decades. It is authoritarian jargon   It was “reasonable” for the Central Elec-  the future of our society.
       which means the Court elastically can   tions Committee to ban the right-wing   What is next? Well, would a decision
       go any way it pleases; as are the Court’s   and anti-Arab “Otzma Le-Yisrael” party   by the government to extend Israeli law
       “broad interpretations” of law to fit its   from running in the three last election   to security zones and all settlements in
       own perceptions of “values,” “balance,”   campaigns, said the High Court. But   Judea and Samaria be a “reasonable”
       and “equality.”                      it was “unreasonable” to disallow the   decision? How about the opposite
                                            anti-Israel Joint Arab List from running,   decision – to dismantle all settlements?
       Given the longstanding  makeup of    including some of its openly pro-ter-
       the Court, decisions that employ such   rorist candidates like Heba Yazbak and   Which of these decisions would be “rea-
                                                                                 sonable” and which not? The imperious
       supple and flexible principles invariably   Hanin Zoabi.                  High Court justices will decide, not the
       are skewed in favor of the liberal side of                                electorate – unless the Knesset legis-
       the political spectrum.              So it was again this year when the High   lates limits on the High Court’s reach,
                                            Court of Justice struck down the 2017
       And thus, the Court has ruled in recent   Settlements Regularization Law as   or at least enacts an override provision.
       years with a liberal fist on the allocation   “unconstitutional,” because it impinges
       of JNF land, Palestinian residency rights   on the land rights of absentee Palestin-
       in Israel, rights of foreign converts to   ians and mere cash compensation isn’t
       citizenship, Haredi draft deferments   sufficient. But it was okay to crush the   David M. Weinberg is vice president of
       and stipends to yeshiva students, com-  rights of Israeli Jews and expel them   the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and
       merce and road closings on Shabbat,   from their homes in Gush Katif with   Security, jiss.org.il.  His personal site is
       and more.                            a few pennies of compensation. (The   davidmweinberg.com.







                                                                                                                 |  41
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46