Page 35 - HaMizrachi Purim Australia 5781
P. 35

PURIM READING


              Megillah Overview                                              Rabbi Menachem Leibtag





       Hide and Seek









             nyone singing  Az Yashir       return to Jerusalem, just as the prophet   introduces Mordechai (2:5) may be the
             (Shemot 15:1–18) or recit-     Yirmiyahu had predicted (see Ezra    most ironic line in the entire Megillah!
       Aing the Hallel (Tehillim 114)       1:1–7). Could the fact that Am Yisrael   Note that the phrase ish Yehudi is men-
       declares publicly and explicitly that G-d   remained scattered among the 127   tioned only one other time in the entire
       receives the credit for the miracles of   provinces of the Persian Empire (see   Tanach – in Zechariah 8:23. There, the
       the Exodus. In contrast, an audience   3:8), even though they could/should   ish Yehudi describes a devout Jew in
       listening to Megillat Esther has no idea   have returned a generation or two ear-  Jerusalem – leading a group of non-Jew-
       if G-d is behind our salvation, for His   lier, not relate to the prophetic message   ish pilgrims who have come to the
       Name is never mentioned, not even    of the Megillah?                     Temple in search of G-d. Furthermore,
       once!
                                            A second clue can be discerned from the   the word haBira, up until this time,
       Nonetheless, the Talmud (Megillah    opening words of Haman to Achash-    had been used exclusively to describe
       14a) considers the public reading of the   verosh: “There is a certain nation scat-  the Temple (see Divrei HaYamim 29:1
       Megillah equivalent to our recitation of   tered among the nations whose laws are   & 29:19). Now it describes Shushan!
       Hallel and the Song of the Sea!      different than any other nation, but the   Finally, the name Mordechai is most
       Chazal seemingly understood the      laws of the King they do not keep, and it   provocative for it stems from the name
       absence of G-d’s Name from the Megil-  is not worthwhile for the King to leave   of the chief Babylonian deity – Marduk
       lah was not only intentional, but also its   them be...” (3:8).           (see II Kings 25:27 & Yeshayahu 39:1).
       key message! The deliberate obfusca-  Chazal raise the possibility that at times   Might we conclude that the Jewish
       tion of G-d’s Name begs the reader to   “the King” in Megillat Esther may be   people had replaced their G-d with
       find G-d “hiding” behind the dramatic   “holy,” i.e. it may be alluding to G-d   Achashverosh, and their Temple with
       narrative.  This style of composition   Himself, and not only to Achashverosh.   Achashverosh’s palace? Had the bira in
       may reflect an eternal religious mes-  If correct, this verse may be a subtle   Yerushalayim become Shushan haBira?
       sage, that throughout our history, we   allusion to G-d’s disappointment with   The Megillah’s primary message is
       must constantly search for G-d, even   the fact Am Yisrael had not returned
       though He appears to be hidden. (It may   to their Land. After all, in Yirmiya-  surely for the reader to perceive the
                                                                                 hidden hand of G-d behind our salva-
       also explain the peculiar name change   hu’s prophecy of future redemption
       of Hadassah to Esther. )             (29:10-14), he promised not only the   tion. Yet its more subtle message may
                          1
                                                                                 be that this entire crisis could have been
       If our assumption is correct, then possi-  opportunity of return from Exile, but   averted had we only answered G-d’s
       bly another key Biblical theme may also   also stated G-d’s expectation that Am   earlier call to begin our redemption.
       be intentionally ‘missing’ in the Megil-  Yisrael would be eager to return and   A more detailed version of this essay can
       lah, i.e. the Land of Israel. Could the   re-establish themselves as His nation
       author of the Megillah want the reader   in the Land of Israel.           be found at tanach.org/purim.htm.
       to ask not only where is G-d, but also   Furthermore, the Cyrus Declaration
       – where is His Land?                 had provided the Jews not only with the   1   Lehastir = to hide. See Esther 2:7 and Chullin
       If so, we would expect the Megillah to   “right of return” but also the opportu-  139b.
       leave us with at least a few clues.  nity to rebuild their Temple. There may   2   See 1:7 & 5:1. Note also Megillah 12a.
                                            be a subtle allusion to this in the Megil-
       The first clue may be “hiding” in its
       opening verse, as it highlights that   lah’s extravagant detail of the vessels at
                                            Achashverosh’s party in Shushan and in
       Achashverosh is a Persian king. Con-                          2           Rabbi Menachem Leibtag is an internation-
       sidering that Cyrus (Koresh) is known   its description of his palace.  Had the   ally acclaimed Tanach scholar and online
                                                                                 Jewish education pioneer.
       to be the first Persian king, hence the   Jews chosen Shushan over Jerusalem?
       story in Megillat Esther takes place   Finally, when we consider the proph-    A member of the Mizrachi Speakers Bureau
       after the Jews had an opportunity to   ecies of Zechariah, the very verse that   mizrachi.org/speakers





                                                                                                                |  35
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40