Page 1237 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 1237

11.     The  Assistant  Registrar/SCD  informed  the  Panel  that  these  recommendations  were
               incorporated into a draft syllabus for  CSEC® Theatre Arts that was circulated to teachers, subject
               specialists and theatre practitioners for comments. She reminded the members of the Panel that
               based on the recommendations, they should examine the syllabus document in its entirety, ensuring
               that the Rationale, Aims, General Objectives, Specific Objectives, Content and Assessment Procedures
               were properly linked. She further advised that particular attention should be paid to the suggestions
               and concerns of all stakeholders.

               THE PANEL’S RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED

               Teacher Questionnaire

               12.     The Assistant Registrar/SCD informed the Panel that an eight-page, 17-item questionnaire was
               posted on Survey Gizmo and the link was sent to teachers of CSEC® Theatre Arts in the Participating
               Territories.  Completed  questionnaires  were  received  from  16  persons  in  six  of  the  Participating
               Territories  (see  list  of  respondents  at  Appendix  IIa).  These  territories  were  Barbados,  Dominica,
               Guyana, Jamaica, St Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago. The questionnaire sought to obtain information
               and suggestions from practising teachers on all aspects of the syllabus, including the appropriateness
               of the knowledge and skills being taught, the clarity of the objectives, the adequacy of the content,
               and the validity of the assessment tasks and procedures, including the School-Based Assessment.

               13.     An analysis of the comments on items of the questionnaire revealed that all, but one of the
               respondents agreed that the Rationale clearly justified the studying of Theatre Arts in the school
               curriculum. The one participant who opposed provided the following justification.

                       While the Rationale justifies the value placed on the course, it does not justify the
                       need to study the course. This is especially true in environments where career choices
                       (predominantly in medicine, engineering and law) determine the need for studying
                       particular courses.

               In light of the respondent’s concern, the Panel reviewed the Rationale and determined that it was not
               lacking in this regard. The Panel indicated that the following extract from paragraph 2 of the Rationale
               is indicative of its coverage of the value of studying Theatre Arts.

                       Through Theatre Arts, students will develop as Ideal Caribbean Persons who have an
                       informed  respect  of  their  cultural  heritage  which  allows  them  to  be  independent,
                       critical and divergent thinkers, steeped in a strong sense of Caribbean identity from
                       which to communicate effectively with others. Theatre Arts allows them to build self-
                       esteem, self-confidence and take pride in themselves as creative human beings (see
                       details in the syllabus in Appendix III).

               However, in light of the comment, the Panel revised the list of Career Choices that the study of Theatre
               Arts may benefit and agreed that an important way of showing the value of the subject is to connect
               it to the different possible career pathways.

               14.       All  of  the  respondents  to  the  survey  were  also  of  the  opinion  that  the  Aims,  as  stated,
               adequately reflected the goals of the syllabus. The Panel also agreed that the Aims of the syllabus
               adequately described anticipated educational results. However, the Panel decided that the use of the
               term ‘new media technologies’ in Aim 1 presented a limited view of technology. Consequently, the
               Panel decided to replace this term with the use of the term ‘technology’, which they felt was more
               inclusive of the different types of technology. All of the respondents to the survey were also of the
               opinion that the General Objectives adequately reflect the outcomes of classroom instruction. On the
               other hand, the Panel felt that some General Objectives needed to be re-ordered and refined to better

                                                            5
   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242