Page 1532 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 1532

less than that of Modules 1 and 2. In 2017, 42 per cent of the candidates achieved Grades A–
               C in Module 3 compared with 33 per cent in 2016.


               198.  Performance  in  Unit  2  was  similar  to  that  of  Unit  1.  In  2017,  96  per  cent  of  the
               candidates achieved Grades I–V, the acceptable grades, compared with 91 per cent in 2016.
               This represents an increase of approximately 5 per cent.

               199.  Performance  on  all  three  Modules,  improved.  Unlike  Unit  1,  however,  most
               improvement  was  noted  on  Module  3,  Prose  Fiction.  Performance  on  Module  1,  Drama,
               increased from 43 per cent at Grades A–C in 2016 to 58 per cent in 2017. Fifty-nine per cent
               of the candidates achieved Grades A–C in 2017 on Module 2, Poetry, compared with 44 per
               cent in 2017, while on Module 3, Prose Fiction, 66 per cent of the candidates achieved Grades
               A–C in 2017 compared with 41 per cent in 2017.


               FAC 2017 (54) - PERFORMING ARTS

               200.  There was a marginal increase in the performance of candidates on Unit 1, Business
               for the Creative Arts. Approximately 95 per cent of the candidates achieved acceptable grades
               in 2017 compared with 94 per cent in 2016. Two per cent of the candidates achieved Grade
               1. The performance on all three modules: Module 1, Business Feasibility, Module 2, Business
               Development and Planning and Module 3, Project Planning for the Arts was commendable.

               201.  Similar to 2016, the candidate entry was small for all four options of Unit 2.


               Option A — Cinematic Arts

               202.  Seven candidates registered for this Option. All seven candidates achieved acceptable
               grades. One candidate achieved Grade I and the other six, Grade II.   The quality of work on
               Paper 02, the written component, showed some improvement compared with 2016.


               Option B — Dance

               203.  Thirteen candidates wrote the Dance examination. Three candidates achieved Grade
               II, six Grade III and four, Grade IV.  It was noted that the performance on each of the modules:
               Module 1, History and the Dancing Body, Module 2, Technique and Performance Skills, and
               Module 3, Choreography and Performance was good.


               Option C—Drama

               204.  Fifty-four  candidates  wrote  the  examination.   All  of  the  candidates  received
               acceptable grades ranging from Grade I to V.   Six candidates achieved Grade I; 20, Grade II;
               14 Grade III; 11, Grade IV, and 3 Grade V. The performance of candidates on each of the
               modules: Module 1, Caribbean Theatre and the World, Module 2, Forming the Performer, and
               Module 3, The Art of Performance was good.







                                                           43
   1527   1528   1529   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537