Page 268 - Gulf Precis (V)_Neat
P. 268

70
                            201. In May 1883 Major Henry Trotter, tlio Military Attache at Constan­
                                                      tinople reported tluit two gun-vessels, Shn it
                             Secret E.| Auguit 1883, Nos. G2-G3.
                                                      and Fratt wore launched at the Govern­
                         ment dockyard at Constantinople for service in connection with the slave trade
                        in the lied Sea and Persian Gulf.
                            2(52. In December 1887 the corvottc Jluzuffcr and tho despatch boat
                                                      Sureya of tho Ottoman Navy left ostensi­
                          Eitcrcnl A., Auguit 1883, Nos. 41-llG, No 410.
                                                      bly for tho Mediterranean, but it was
                         discovered subsequently that they proceeded to the lied Sea in company with two
                         other ships of the Mahsounneo and company having on hoard 2,000 recruits for
                         tho Yemen and llojnj. Tho two latter ships then proceeded to tho Persian
                         Gulf, taking military stores. It was also in contemplation to send additional
                         ships, ostensibly for tho purpose of showing tho Ottoman flag during the pilgrim
                         season.
                            263. In view of tho constant pressure brought to bear upon the Porto to
                         take measures to punish tho pirates on tho 'Katif waters and to enforce com­
                         pensation from them, tho question was whether Her Majesty’s Government
                         could object to this ro-enforoement of the Turkish naval force. As to the views
                         of Her Majesty’s Government on this point—See Chapter Jiighth (VI).
                            261. It oppearod from the reports of Mr. Dobertson, the Assistant Politi­
                          Turkish measures for cstnblishing their   cal Agent, Basrah, (a) No. 122, of 12th
                         jurisdiction on a firmer basis on tho Arab March and (b) No. 135 of tllO 22nd March
                         coast. Increase of Turkish forces in Katar,
                         1888-1680.                   188*5, that Nafiz Pasha, the Turkish Gov­
                          Kxierutl A , Auguit 1888, No*. 411—4lG.  ernor-General of Basrah, had early in that
                          External A., February !Sb9, No*. 33G—3-lG.
                                                      year visited Katif and Katar with tho
                         objoct of taking measures for the suppression of piracy in the Persian Gulf,
                         and that he had taken pledges from Sheikh Jasiin-Bm-Thani of Katar, and
                         MjSfiammad-bin-Abdul Wahab of Darain, for the security of tho coasts and
                         waters within their influence and jurisdiction, and had left with Jasim bin
                         Thani a steam-launch and crew to he used in patrolling tho coasts. 11 is Ex­
                         cellency also provided coal depots at Itas-cl-Tanuvah and Bidaa. As a further
                         measuro for tho security of tho waters of the Persian Gulf, the Governor-Gen­
                         eral of Basrah also established military posts at Bidaa, and a complete battalion
                         of infantry, numbering about 400 men, was subsequently despatched from
                         Basrah to form garrisons for the above mentioned places. The garrisons woro,
                         however, placed there with tho ostensible object of carrying out the wishes of
                         Her Majesty’s Government for tho effectual suppression of piracy on the
                         west coast of the Persian Gulf.
                            2G5. Theso facts were reported by tho British Ambassador at Constan­
                         tinople to the Foreign Oflice, and on reference having been made to the India
                         Office the following opinion was expressed by the Secretary of State for India :—
                            “ Lord Cross thinks it may be sufficient for the present to acquaint Sir
                                                      W. White, if tho Marques of Salisbury
                          Pro. No. 345 of External A., Fcbruai t 18S9. No*.
                         336-346.                     sees no objection thereto, that Jler Majes­
                                                      ty's Government do not consider that the
                         Forte is in effective occupation of the Arabian Coast beyond Katif, and that
                         they a'lhcre to the declaration made in 1883 that the claim of the Porte to
                         rights of sovereignty over Katar coast is not admitted by ncr Majesty’s Gov­
                         ernment. -But as there is no reason to anticipate that any practical result
                         would be attained by provoking a discussion with the Turkish Government (W
                         to the extent of its jurisdiction on that coast, it is undesirable to raise the
                         question at the present time."
                            This view was concurred in by the Foreign Oflice and communicated to
                         Sir W. White (Despatch No. 338, dated 5th November 1888).
                            20G. The Porte wished now to give a plain indication of its determination
                                                      to assert its jurisdiction in ICatnr. In
                                      1859.
                                                      July 1880, Sir W. While received a pro-
                                                      memoria from the Turkish
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273