Page 272 - Gulf Precis (V)_Neat
P. 272

74
                        unreasonable periods, though they may have boon over two months out from
                        India, and paying no attention to claims filed by them for debts recoverable
                        from Turkish subjects.
                            270. The unsettled condition of the Katif district since 1885, and the
                        attempt made on the high soa by the pirate Ahmed bin Sclraan in the same
                        year to murder Tikamdas Dwarkadas who escaped with the loss of his right
                        hand and Its. 40,000 worth of pearls, further discouraged them from continuing
                        their residence iu that district and obliged thorn to carry on their business
                        transactions through local merchants who did not always look after tlio interests
                        of their principals, and Gnally Messrs. Gungaram Tikamdas three years ago
                        made another attempt to establish themselves there and sent across one of their
                        Mahomedan employes named Ilaji Jirna bin Naser, who was repelled by the
                        Turkish ollioials, and from that date tho Hindus praotically suspended direct
                        trade with Katif.
                            277. "Wo shall also note below a few specific complaints of Indian and
                        Bahroineso traders which were brought to tho notice of G ovemmont.

                            278 In January 1884 a complaint was made by a Nakoda of a native
                                                     vessel Mubarak owned by a British Indian
                         Impressment of a British Indian vessel ly Tur-
                        kith authorities at Katif, 1SS1.  trader for forcibly compelling him to
                          External A,— Ortober 1884, Noi. 434—410.   convey Turkish soldiers from Katif to
                          March 1605. Ncs. 169—166.
                                                     Ojair. A note verable was addressed by
                        the British Ambassador to the Porte requesting that a suitable indemnity might
                        be paid to the Captain of tho ship and that orders might be sent to tho Turkish
                        authorities at Basrah not to impress vessels Hying the British Flag. A copy of
                        this noto was sent by Assim Pasha to tho Vali at Baghdad, and Mr. Plowden
                        was asked to do his utmost to have the question settlod. In reply to an enquiry
                        by Mr. Plowden, Colonel Ross fixed a sum of Rs. 50 as a reasouablo compensa­
                        tion.
                            279. In January 1893 tho Chief of Bahrein complained to us regarding the
                                             “ ***"“ Bahrein boats and their crewfat Katif!
                          External A, March 1893, No*. 108—113,  The Political Resident reported, however,
                        (Letter No. 32, dated the 15th February 1893):—
                           “ The fees referred to are levied on all vessels alike and not on Bahrein boats in particular.
                        The port of Katif is under Turkish suzerainty, and therefore no legitimate grounds for our
                        interference in the matter would appear to exist. Tho Chief of Bahrein accordingly been
                        informed that it would not be possible to address the Ottoman Government upon tho subject,
                        but that if, owing to the levy of ports dues or other fees by the Turkish authorities, the voyage
                        to Katif is no longer profitable, the boat owners can legitimately raise their presout rates of
                        freight to Turkish ports. I liavo also commuuicatcd with the Resident iu Turkish Arabia in
                        the above sense.
                            280. The Indian merchants also complained of the excess of export
                         Non-refund of exeat export duties levied, duties levied OD them at OO0 time.
                                                         export duty of only 1 per cent, ad
                          Pebru*ry 1897, No*. ici—16«.   valorem is leviable on exports from
                          M^ci899?NoO97.160""1G2,    Turkey to India; but, to prevent fraudu-
                          jua« 1897, No«. 145-149.   .   lent advantage being taken of this low rate
                        of duty in the trade with Persia, exports to which arc liable to a higher
                        rate, traders sending goods by sailing vessels, are obliged to deposit 8 per cent,
                        before they can remove their property. Of this 8 per cent. 7 per cent, are
                        to be returned on production, within 121 days, of certificates showing that the
                        goods in question have really reached Indian ports. Though this is the rule,
                        British Indian traders from Bahrein had, for a long timo, been exporting dates
                        to India from Katif without knowing that they woro entitled to a rofuud, the
                        Turkish Customs authorities keeping the 7 per cent, which they should have

                            280-A. Though tho matter was first brought to the notice of this Residency
                        many years hack, it docs not appear to have been taken up strongly till 1895,
                        when the traders petitioned, and a protracted correspondence was commanocd
   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277