Page 269 - Gulf Precis(VIII)_Neat
P. 269

*5
            received from the Commodore at Bombay on the 9th of March was, that the only
            vessel at his disposal was for the moment in dock, but that it was hoped she
            would be ready lor sea by the end of the month, when she would be at once des­
            patched to Aden to watch the progress of events.
                13.  In the beginning of December 1867, Colonel Felly called the attention
                                          of Government to a serious breach of the
             Political Proreedings, February 1868, Nos. J37-
            39-                           peace which had just taken place in the
            Persian Gulf at the instigation of the Chiefs of Aboothabce and Bahrein. He
            animadverted on the fact that the LI ugh Rose, which was not able to run under
            steam more than eight hours consecutively, and which was manned by a native
            crew was the only vessel at hand for enforcing peace amongst his turbulent neigh­
            bours. Notwithstanding the weakness of his position he advised that Aboothabee
            should be blockaded, in order that the Chief and his tribesmen might be debarred
            from the pearl fishery, and so be put to sensible loss ; but the Government of Bom­
            bay at once replied that such a course, however desirable, was out of the question
            when there was not the means to carry it through efficiently. livery available
            ship on  the station had been sent to Anneslcy Bay in connection with the
            Abyssinian Expedition ; but the want was so imperative, that the Government of
            India at once enquired from Commodore Iielth whether he could not detach one
            vessel from his squadron.
                14.  Meanwhile the Shah of Persia, who was utterly without the power to
                                          protect his subjects' property at sea, had
             Political P(o:ccdings, June 18G8, Nos. 111 • 16.
                                          been cogitating over the expediency of
            obtaining from Europe some small ships of war, and in the end had inclined to
            the plan suggested by Her Majesty’s Minister at Teheran of getting out armed
            steamers at intervals from England and having them commanded by English
            officers. But to this project the Supreme Government saw objections, and in
            the interests of Persia, equally with those of India, recommended the establish­
            ment of a small marine lorce exclusively for operations in and about the Persian
            Gulf. “ Such a force,” it was remarked in the despatch on the subject, ” would
            more effectually secure the Shah’s real interest than any force of his own, while
            it would give stability to our ascendancy in the Gulf, which, ever since the aboli­
            tion of the local navy, there has been some risk of our losing, and would exclude
            all pretext for the intervention of other powers. •  •  • It is chiefly from
            the absence of such a force that present political complications between the Gov­
            ernments of Persia and Maskat and between several of the maritime tribes have
            arisen, and it is in our opinion impossible for the peace of the Gulf to be maintained
            and trade protected unless the Resident at Bushire has at his command the
            means of enforcing the terms of the maritime truce. The question is one of vital
            importance to our political position in the Gulf, and it is matter of much regret to
            us that, when the Indian Navy was abolished, some special arrangements were
             Letter from Colonel Peiiy to the Government of not made by the maintenance of a small
            Bombay, No. 96 of i838. paragraph to.  force for the protection of our interests in
            these seas.” The question was referred for the opinion of the Lords of the
             Secret despatch No. iSl dated December ^tb. Admiralty and the Secretary of State for
            1868, with encoi«:ej.         Foreign Affairs, both of whom were oppos­
            ed to any change in the existing system. The old arguments which led to the
            abolition of the Indian Navy were reiterated, and a further point was raised, that
            it was of importance for vessels of war, which might at any time be brought
            into contact with vessels of other European Powers visiting Indian Seas, to be
            under the direct control of the Government at home, and under the responsibility
            of the Senior Naval Officer of the station. The Secretary of State for India,
            however, left it for the consideration of the Supreme Government whether a cer­
            tain number of gun-boats commissioned by the Admiralty, and manned mostly
            by lascars, and native marines, but under the orders of the Indian authorities,
            might not answer the purpose. He had reasons to believe that such a measure,
            if acceptable to the Viceroy and his Council, would meet with no opposition at
            home.
                14-A. As regards the ambition of the Shah of Persia to purchase gunboats,
                                        the Minister at Teheran was told that he
               Political A., Juno i£68, Nos Il6-19.
                                        should endeavour to dissuade the Shah from
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274