Page 119 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 119

113
      Empire to give their good offices to any native of Bahrein who might have occasion to
      apply to them in reaped of thoir dealings with Turkish authorities.
         The British Ambassador, sneaking subsequently to tlm Grand Vizier on the sumo
      subject, stated that, hy virtue ot the Convention of 1 KG I, the Sheikh of Bahrein must Sir,Clara Ford, No. 537,
      be regarded as entirely independent of Turkish sovereignty.   Novombor 10,1803.
         Ill u further despatch. Sir Clare Ford reported that lie had informed the Grand Sir Cl.iro ^No. 598,
      Vizier that tlm claim of the I'orto to treat IhihreineHo as Turkish subjects when in Decombor JO, 1893.
      Ottoman territory won inadmissible by Her Majesty's Government, who would extend
      their protection to natives of Bahrein whenever occasion culled for it.
         13.  It being the reported intention of the Al-bin-.\li tribe to form a settlement at   LS95.
      Zobara, with the support of the Turkish Mutessnril of Ilasu, the British Ambassador at
      Constantinople was instructed, in May 1895, to inform the Forte that the formation of  To Sir 1*. Currie, No. 200,
      such a settlement would constitute a menace to Bahrein. Ilo was also instructed to   May 30. 189.r.; and from
      state that, if the project were proceeded with, tlm Government of India would be   ditto, No. -101, Juuo 2,
      compelled to tako measures for tho protection of the Chief of that island.  1895.
         Later in tho year, in tho course of a further remonstrance addressed to tho Forto Sir P. Currto, ^ No. 520,
      respecting tho action of Turkish otlicials on tho 151 Katr coast, tho statement was   August 12,  189u.
      reiterated that all Turkish claims to Bahrein, which was under tho protection of Her
      Majesty tho Queen of England, wero totally inadmissible.
         A Memorandum on this subject was communicated to the Turkish Ambassador on   1S95.
      the 23rd August. 1895. It was stated therein that Her Majesty’s Government did not To Rustonl pasha, August
      admit that this part of tho coast was under Turkish juriHd.ntioii, hut that Bahrein was 23, 1895.
      under British protection, and Her Majesty's Government could not allow any
      interference with or attack upon it.
         In a further Memorandum, communicated to the Turkish Ambassador in tho To Anthopouloa I'nxba, Do-
      following your, it was ro-stated that Bahrein was under British protection, and that the  comber 5, 1890.
      Turkish claim to jurisdiction over that portion of tho coast of the Persian Gulf in
      which Zolmrn was situated could not bo admitted.
         14.  In February 1890 a note vcrbale was addressed to tho Forte by tho British   189G.
      Ambassador, loquesting tho issue of instructions to the Vuli of Bussoruh to admit the glp ^ Currio   No. 141,
      right of the British Consul to intervene on behalf of Bahrein subjects. The note Kobruary 19,1890.
      reminded tho Porte that the Chief of Bahrein was under the protection of the Queen of
      England, and it was, therefore, quite inadmissible that the natives of Bahrein should,
      when on Ottomau territory, be treated us Turkish subjects.
         15.  Attention was called by the Forte in 1905 to tho measures taken against   1905.
      Buhreinese for the ill-treatment of a German subject. Lord Lansdowuo informed the   To Mr. Toxvnloy, No. 59,
      Turkish Ambassador, in reply to his representations on tho subject, that it was u mutter   February 22, 1005.
      of common knowledge, auu well known to the Turkish Government, that His Majesty's
      Government had direct relations with the Sneikh of Bahrein, and that the island and
      ils natives were under British protection. He went on to say that His Majesty’s
      Government were within their rights in taking measures to obtain redress for tho
      outrage committed there.
         This statement was repeated later in tho year to tho Turkish Ambassador, when
      be was informed that His Majesty’s Government must decline to entertain any further To Musurus 1’asba, May
      representations from tho Turkish Government on the subject   20»

                          (3.) Turkish Declarations.
         At au interview, ou the 25th April, 1871, between M. Pisani (chief Dragoman to   1871.
      the British Embassy) and tho Grand Vizier (Aali Pasha), in reference to a contemplated   Sir H. Elliot, No. 171, April
      Turkish Expedition to Nojd, Aali Puslm said the British Ambassador might give the   20, 1871.
      most positive assurances to Her Majesty’s Government tlmt the Porte entertained no
      iutention whatever of obtaining the supremacy over Bahrein.
         On the 10th December, 1871, nu assurance was given, in reteronco to the Nojd   1S71
      Expedition, by Server Pasha, then Minister for Foreigu Adairs, to M. Pisani (first
      Dragoman of the British Embassy), to the effect tlmt the Sublime Porto had no Sir H’bE11{ofc’ia7^* Do"
      intention of attuckiug or obtaining any supremacy over tho independent tribes ou the ccm cr •   •
      coast of the Persian Gulf.
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124