Page 157 - The Origins of the United Arab Emirates_Neat
P. 157

The Preliminary Oil Concessions:         123

       see  Abu Dhabi getting a good knock on the head'.79 Although
       he conceded that the evidence against Shakhbut was ‘a little lacking
       in precision’, R. T. Peel, Assistant Secretary of the Political Depart­
       ment, thought that security considerations made a strong ease for
       taking a tough line.80 So Fowlc’s suggestions were circulated to
       the Admiralty, the Foreign Office and the Government of India,
        all of which agreed to them.
          In the meantime Fowlc went on leave to London, where he
       discussed the whole problem of Abu Dhabi with the India Office.
        YVciglitman, who officiated as Resident during bis absence, reported
        that Ahmad bin Khalaf bin ‘Utaybah, one of the most influential
        men  of Abu Dhabi and related by marriage to Khalifah bin Zayid,
       Shakhbut’s venerable old uncle, had told the Residency Agent that
       he could negotiate the concession in ten days. Weightman did
        not trust Ahmad bin Khalaf, but he did not discount the possibility
        that Ahmad’s claim signified that Shakhbut had had a change
       of heart.81 After his meeting at the India Office, Fowlc was inclined
        to agree that it would be foolish to enrage Shakhbut by inflicting
       any form of punishment on him; he felt that the wisest course
        would be to stay action until Petroleum Concessions had made
       a fresh approach to the shaykh.
         The policy proved successful, for in the first few days of 1939,
        and in face of the British stand on slave-trading, Shakhbut’s
        resistance crumbled. He agreed to negotiate with Petroleum Conces­
        sions, and Longrigg went to Abu Dhabi to conclude an agreement.
        He took with him a letter from the Political Agent in Bahrain
        that reaffirmed Fowle’s ultimatum of Petroleum Concessions or noth­
        ing, should Shakhbut need a reminder.82 After an especially difficult
        time, during which his entire* family helped to convince him, Shakh­
        but signed, on 11 January 1939, a commercial agreement for seven­
        ty-five years.83 Longrigg reported that one of the main reasons
        why the ruler of Abu Dhabi had finally consented to commit
        himself to Petroleum Concessions was his ‘hope that an agreement
        would be gratifying to the Political authorities, whose better opinion
        he would gladly have.’84 Fowle was delighted. He regarded the
        letter that Longrigg took with him as the best proof of his own
        policy. ‘I have always held the view . . . that once the shaikhs
        were convinced that His Majesty’s Government were in earnest
        as to their “ultimatum” they would come to terms.’85 Apparently,
        however, Longrigg kept the letter in his pocket and did not show
        it to Shakhbut.86
          The two remaining shaykhdoms, Ajman and Umm al-Qaivvain,
        had no territory of possible interest to Petroleum Concessions, which
        consequently did not approach their rulers. Fowle contested the
        wisdom of this, afraid that Socal would try to seize the opportunity
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162