Page 59 - Hikayat-Patani-The-Story-Of-Patani 1
P. 59

CHAPTER III

                              THE STRUCTURE OF THE MALAY TEXT
                                  ITS AUTHORS, DATE, LANGUAGE

                                THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF THE MSS.

                        It is apparent from what has been said so far that little can be
                      concluded concerning the authorship, date, origin or textual history of
                      the Hikayat Patani on the basis of external data and comparison with
                      other books. It now remains for us to investigate to what extent internal
                      evidence, i.e. data from the text as it has been handed down to us, can
                      help us draw some conclusions in this respect.
                        The MSS. as such do not tell us a great deal. The text, or its first
                      story, is announced as “a story which has been told by old people” (A),
                      or as “the story of Patani as it is told by its owner” (B), both of which
                      expressions are mere cliches, not containing any real information. They
                      are frequently repeated in other parts of the text.
                        MS. B does not have a colophon of any kind, but ends abruptly at the
                      end of part I according to our division of the text. The colophon of the
                      Abdullah MS. contains one interesting piece of information apart from
                      the terminus ante quem which is contained in the statement that it was
                      completed in Singapore on 16th October, 1839, in that in the colophon
                      the text is called a Kitab Undang-Undang Patani, that is, “Book of the
                      Laws of Patani”. It is obvious, however, that as a whole this text as
                      contained in A cannot be termed a lawbook, even in the sense of the
                      Malay word undang-undangd This characterization only holds good for
                      the final part of the MS., and more specifically from the last line of p. 88
                      up to the end. Pp. 1—88 are not a Kitab Undang-Undang at all, but
                      should rather be called a Sejarah Patani (cf. Sejarah Melayu) or a
                      Hikayat Patani (cf. the Hikayat Raja-Raja Pasai, Hikayat Banjar). As
                      B itself uses the term Hikayat Patani we have preferred to use that name
                      throughout the book (abbreviated as HP).
                        The discrepancy between the title of manuscript A and its main
                       1 On Malay undang-undang, see, a.o., Winstedt, 1945, Emanuels, 1964, Hooker,
                         1968, and below, Chapter VI, section 29.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64