Page 61 - Hikayat-Patani-The-Story-Of-Patani 1
P. 61

52                   HIKAYAT PATANI

                       passage on adat, and especially on the royal orchestra and the melodies
                       and techniques used in playing the instruments of that orchestra. This
                       appendix is connected loosely to the main body of the Hikayat by the
                       information (p. 89) that after the death of Mudhaffar Syah only half
                       the instruments of the orchestra could be played through lack of
                       competent players, many of whom had not returned from Ayudhya; it
                       is uncertain, however, whether this link was made purposely by the
                       editor who later added this part to the Hikayat, or whether he took this
                       remark ready-made from his source.
                        It is difficult to determine when exactly these additions were made to
                       the Malay text, or when they were originally written. Some remarks will
                       be made in this connection below. It is interesting to note, however, that
                       both Abdullah and the copyist of Newbold’s MS. faithfully copied this
                       piece of Patani Undang-Undang together with the Hikayat. Abdullah
                       certainly must have been well aware of the fact that as a whole this text
                       could not be called an undang-undang; but he may have felt the link
                       between this kind of text and a Malay history to be quite natural and
                       have found nothing wrong with copying the text as he found it —
                       including the name at the end.

                                      THE DIVISION INTO SIX PARTS
                         With regard to the rest of the Hikayat Patani, too, the question
                       whether we really have here a homogeneous text must be raised. There
                       are, in fact, strong reasons for doubting the unity of the Hikayat Patani
                       as contained in MS. A. The text can be conveniently divided into six
                       parts, and we have used this division throughout the present book:

                        I.  The history of Patani during the rule of the Inland Dynasty
                           (PP- 1—74).
                        II.  The story of Patani during the rule of the Kalantan Dynasty,
                           ending with the rule of Alung Yunus (pp. 74—78).
                       III.  A summary of the Bendaharas of Patani (pp. 78—80).
                       IV.  The story of the elephant doctor Cau Hang and his progeny, in­
                           cluding the Bendahara Datuk Cerak Kin (pp. 80—83).
                        V.  The story of the death of Datuk Sai and the struggle between the
                           pretenders to the position of bendahara during the reign of the
                           Kalantan Dynasty (pp. 83—88).
                       VI.  The Undang-Undang Patani (pp. 88—94).

                         When studying the relationship between the different parts the first
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66