Page 25 - Producing a Video to Communicate a New Model of Coaching to GAA Coaches
P. 25
2.2 Narrative in Learning
‘Narrative is deeply appealing and richly satisfying to the human soul, with an allure
that transcends cultures, centuries, ideologies, and academic disciplines.’
Rossiter, M. (2003)
In addressing this theme I will attempt to provide the reader with a brief overview of
learning theory and the advance in constructivism, look at the origins of story and the
importance of narrative in learning and identify the key elements of a narrative
approach to learning.
2.2.1 Theories of learning and the advance of constructivism
There are many theories of education and a history of research into how learning
occurs. Alessi and Trollip (2001) outline changes in the focus of the psychology of
th
learning throughout the 20 century, identifying the early dominance of
behaviourism, followed by an expansion into the ideas of cognitivism and the
advancement of constructivism. Both behavioural and cognitive theories of learning
are categorised as objective in nature (Mergel, 1998) and maintain that learning is
based on an understanding and application of objective rules by which the world
operates (Alessi & Trollip, 2001). On the other hand Alessi and Trollip (2001) report
that constructivism maintains that ‘knowledge is not received from outside, but that
we construct knowledge in our head’ (p. 31).
Aligning to the constructivist approach, Säljö (1979) defines learning as ‘making
sense or abstracting meaning’, and furthermore states that ‘learning involves relating
parts of the subject matter to each other and to the real world.’ The literature further
supports this definition by identifying key elements of the constructivist approach to
learning as being interaction, or the active role of the learner (Szurmak & Thuna,
2013), and the construction of meaning from experience (Clark & Rossiter, 2008).
Building on foundational work by Jean Piaget (1976), who advocated learning as an
independent constructive process, Vygotsky (1978) proposed a social constructivist
approach to learning where (potential) development is determined by the distance
between one’s independent problem solving capability and socially supported
problem solving, a concept he termed ‘the zone of proximal development’ (p. 86).
13