Page 379 - Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Getty Museum Conservation, By David Scott
P. 379

importance. Linda Merk-Gould used the  MHP  method at a pressure of 1000 - 4000 psi for clean­
             ing prior  to repatination  (Harris 1994).  She  used  this method  several  times  to  clean  outdoor
             bronze sculpture and obtained good results without undue  damage to the  surfaces.
                                    I  LASER  CLEANING  Laser cleaning of metals is a recent devel­
             opment. A neodymium (Nd) laser has been successfully  used  to clean surface  concretions  from
             stone objects. The use of a controlled burst of high-energy photons produced by a laser can also
             be  used  to clean  metallic surfaces.  With  this method,  the  minerals  are  ablated,  or vaporized,
             from the surface, removing the corrosion without the need for chemical reagents. The principal
             problem with this technique is controllability of the  results.
                A number of different approaches to the  use of lasers for the cleaning of metallic surfaces
             have been published. For example, Asmus  (i987)  suggests the  use of carbon dioxide lasers for
             metal cleaning, while Watkins (1997) reviews the application of Nd : Yag lasers to the cleaning of
             bronzes.  Removal of tarnish from  the  surface  of silver-coated copper  daguerreotypes  with  an
             excimer laser has been investigated by Turovets, Maggen, and Lewis (i998).
                Cottam  and  coworkers  (1997)  discuss cleaning metallic surfaces using a TEA-C0 2  laser-
             ablation technique  at 10.6 μιη in the far infrared. Copper  and bronze with both naturally and
             artificially grown corrosion layers were treated. The inorganic minerals comprising the corro­
             sion crust showed a varied response to the laser radiation. In general, it was found that the more
             complex copper-corrosion products such  as brochantite were more susceptible  to ablation than
             simple compounds  such  as cuprite.

             Unanswered questions     Difficult  aesthetic and  scientific questions  remain  unanswered
                                      regarding  the  cleaning of outdoor  sculpture,  especially  since
             many objects will  require re-treatment in years to come, and some may have to be  repatinated
             or recoated yet again. All outdoor sculpture requires maintenance,  such  as washing and rewax-
             ing every two years or so, and this is frequently overlooked in treatment proposals.  Naude  and
             Wharton  (1995) have prepared a useful handbook, Guide to the Maintenance of Outdoor Sculpture,
             that discusses the issues involved in establishing a maintenance  program for such works.


         C H E M I C A L  C L E A N I N G  T R E A T M E N T S

             Chemical methods  of cleaning have a long history and traditionally include the  use of domes­
             tic materials,  such  as lemon juice, with which  corroded  objects  could be  scrubbed.  Chemical
             cleaning seeks to remove some or all of the patina, or corrosion, on the surface of the object. In
             conservation practice, chemical cleaning usually attempts  selective removal of certain types of
             corrosion layers or chemical substances, leaving others unaffected. For example, in the cleaning
             of bronzes it is common to leave the cuprite layer adjacent  to the metal intact, since removal of
             this layer usually reveals bare metal, which amounts to complete stripping of the surface, which,
             in most cases, is undesirable.


                           C H A P T E R  T W E L V E
                           362
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384