Page 184 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 184

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition

           The point is that if a rapture takes place in the sequence
        of the second coming of Christ, it would be the first event and
        would automatically separate all the saved from the unsaved
        before Christ’s feet ever touched the Mount of Olives and
        before His kingdom was instituted. In Matthew 25:31-46,
        however, the sheep and the goats representing the saved and
        the lost are intermingled and require separation by a special
        judgment that follows the second coining of Christ. Such a
        judgment would be unnecessary if a posttribulational Rapture
        had occurred, although it can be easily harmonized with a
        pretribulational rapture. For this reason, even classic post-
        tribulationists like Reese do not even mention the judgment of
        the nations or make any attempt to solve the problem.
           Gundry is to be commended for attempting to solve the
        problem, but he did so by extreme methods, namely, moving
        the judgment to the end of the Millennium when, indeed,
        there will be both saved and unsaved present in the world.
        W hile admitting that this is a recent view as far as contempo-
        rarv posttribulationism is concerned, he claimed support of
        Biederwolf. Alford, and Lang.12
           Any attempt, however, to place this judgment at the end
        of the Millennium does so with violation of the text. Matthew
        25:31 states the judgment occurs “when the Son of Man comes
        in his glory, and all the angels with him.” The certain implica­
        tion is that it comes immediately after His second coming, not
        a thousand years later.
           The nature of the good works of the sheep also seems to
        forbid its referring to a millennial situation where they are
        described as befriending brethren who apparently are unfairly
        in prison, who are starved and naked. This is certainly not a
        millennial picture of Israel, and yet Gundry was strangely
        silent on this contradiction in the text of his point of view. The
        writer knows of no recognized contemporary' scholar who
        holds Gundry’s position, although it was held by some older
        premillenarians whose viewpoints were often quite similar to
                            192
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189