Page 245 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 245

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
           One of the ma jor weaknesses of posttribulationists is their
        handling of the doctrine of the Rapture in relationship to the
        Book of Revelation. Their problem is that the Rapture is not
        mentioned in relation to the Second Coming. If the Rapture
        occurs at the second coming of Christ, it would be a major
         feature of end-time events; and the fact that it is not related to
         the Second Coming is most strange if posttrihulationism is
         correct. In the description of the second coming of Christ in
         Revelation 19. neither translation or resurrection as related to
         the process of Christ’s coming from heaven to the earth is
         indicated.
            Posttribulationists. if they follow 1 Thessalonians 4, must
         place the rapture of the church in the sequence of events as
         Christ is coming from heaven to the earth. Instead, the only
         mention of resurrection is found in Revelation 20:4. long after
         the Second Coming is an accomplished fact, and the specifica­
         tion of the passage limits the resurrection to those who died in
         the Great Tribulation. There is absolutely nothing in Revela­
         tion 19-20 to support the idea that there is a rapture of the
         church involved in the second-coming process.
            Posttribulationists attempt to turn the argument against
         the prctribulationists by saying that if there were a pretribula­
         tion Rapture, it ought to be stated in the Book of Revelation.
         The opposite, rather, is the truth. If. as a matter of fact, the
         Rapture has taken place earlier before the Great Tribulation
         ever comes upon the earth, then there would be no need to
         discuss the Rapture in the sequence of later events. If, on the
         other hand, the Rapture is a part of the events of the Second
         Coming, the strange absence of any mention of it certainly is a
         devastating blow to posttribulationists.
            The best posttribulationists can do to cover this lack of
         evidence for a posttribulational Rapture is to dispute certain
         passages that seem to imply a pretribulation Rapture and to
         read into other passages what they do not say in an attempt to
         insert a resurrection where they' feel it should be.

                             254
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250