Page 329 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 329

race),  it  is  much  harder  in  a  creative  environment  (where
                       different points of view about what’s best have to be resolved).
                       If they’re not, the process of sorting through disagreements and
                       knowing  who  has  the  authority  to  decide  quickly  becomes

                       chaotic. Sometimes people get angry or stuck; a conversation
                       can  easily  wind  up  with  two  or  more  people  spinning
                       unproductively and unable to reach agreement on what to do.

                          For  these  reasons,  specific  processes  and  procedures  must
                       be  followed.  Every  party  to  the  discussion  must  understand
                       who has what rights and which procedures should be followed
                       to  move  toward  resolution.  (We’ve  also  developed  tools  for

                       helping do this, which you can review at the end of this book.)
                       And everyone must understand the most fundamental principle
                       for getting in sync, which is that people must be open-minded
                       and assertive at the same time. Thoughtful disagreement is not
                       a battle; its goal is not to convince the other party that he or she
                       is wrong and you are right, but to find out what is true and what
                       to do about it. It must also be nonhierarchical, because in an
                       idea    meritocracy        communication         doesn’t      just    flow
                       unquestioned  from  the  top  down.  Criticisms  must  also  come

                       from the bottom up.

                          For  example,  this  email  was  sent  to  me  by  someone  who
                       worked  for  me  after  a  meeting  with  clients.  All  the  senior
                       people  at  Bridgewater,  including  me,  are  routinely  criticized
                       and judged by our subordinates.

                           From: Jim H

                           To: Ray; Lionel K; Greg J; Randal S; David A

                           Subject: Feedback on ABC Meeting . . .

                           Ray- you deserve a “D-” for your performance today in the
                           ABC meeting and everyone that was in the room that saw

                           you  agrees  on  that  harsh  assessment  (give  or  take  half  a
                           grade). This was especially disappointing for two reasons:
                           1)  You  have  been  great  in  previous  meetings  where  the
                           subject matter to be covered was the same, and 2) We held
                           a specific planning meeting yesterday to ask you to focus
                           tightly on culture and portfolio structuring because we had

                           only 2 hours to have you cover those two topics, me cover
                           the investment process, have Greg do the observatory and
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334