Page 14 - Area X - G

OUR CURRENT SITUATION

MFO 3—Extension Services
All the key performance indicators for Extension Services were attained with satisfactory
accomplishment rating as planned. The University was able to accomplish its targets even with meager
fund for extension activities due to the active linkages it maintains with other agencies and institutions.
As of the period, the University has 70 active linkages. It had catered to 7,845 (weighted) number of
persons for trainings and 984 persons provided with technical advice for the year 2017.

MFO 4—Advanced Education Services
Overall, the targets for MFO 4- Advanced Education Services were satisfactorily surpassed as to
its key performance indicators on the number of graduates and accredited graduate programs having
100% (9 out of 9) “accreditable" programs accredited. The University’s graduate programs are currently
undergoing CHED evaluation for the award of COPC. It has also successfully implemented the Blended
Learning Scheme in facilitating the teaching-learning process in graduate education in partnership with
the University of the Philippines - Open University (UP-OU) both in the campus-based and distance/
transnational education system of program delivery.

The following are facts about the University in term s of its support to operations (STO) and
general administration and support services (GASS) key performance indicators:

Support to Operations (STO)

• Students’ services were rated by majority of students as good and higher.
• The University complied with the requirements for the Quality Management System in preparation
for ISO certification, though as of September 2018, there is no ISO certification yet on at least one of
the core processes;
• The profile of faculty members (Figure 5; Table 4), and the number of employees on scholarship/
study support and trainings and seminars show the University's strong commitment for the welfare
and development of its employees. An average of 51% of faculty members are being sent or
supported for seminars, trainings and conferences; •

Figure 5 - Faculty Profile by Educational Attainment (in milestone years)

• Students were provided with avenues and opportunities for development through OJT in industries
and organizations, and local/regional/national/international competitions, programs and activities;
• Scholarships and financial grants were provided to students to increase the access of poor/
underprivileged but deserving students to quality tertiary education;
• Curricular review/formulation were conducted as well as academic-policies formulated/enhanced
to improve the curricular offerings and academic services of the University;