Page 554 - Area X - G

(Head of Service Unit) (Head of Service Unit) (Head of Service Unit) (Head of Service Unit)

Approved: Approved:
Assessed/Final Rating by: Assessed/Final Rating by:

(Head of Delivery Unit) (Head of Delivery Unit) (Head of Delivery Unit) (Head of Delivery Unit)
Rating Scale for the Final Scores: Assessm ent: January to June Rating Scale for the Final Scores: Assessm ent:
4.51 - 5.00 — Outstanding Total Score: 4.51 - 5.00 — Outstanding Total Score:
3.51 - 4.50 — Very Satisfactory 3.51 - 4.50 — Very Satisfactory
2.51 - 3.50 — Satisfactory Divide by No. of Pis: 2.51 - 3.50 — Satisfactory Divide by No. of Pis:
1.51-2.50 ----- Fair Numerical Rating: 1.51-2.50 ----- Fair Numerical Rating:
1.00- 1.50 ----- Poor 1.00- 1.50 ----- Poor
Adjectival Rating: Adjectival Rating:

OPCR Form 2 - Service Units
Instructions
This form shall contain a presentation of the programs, performance measures of the delivery/service units of the University. Based on the SPMS of the University, particularly the Table of

Column (1): No. - Indicate the number according to the order of the Performance Indicator

Column (2): PAP/Performance Indicator - Indicate the following:
Program (i.e. H igher Education Program , A dvanced Education Program , Research Program , Extension Program , Support to Operations, and G eneral Administration and
Perform ance Indicator - should be those agreed for each program as indicated in the Table of Reference
P erform ance Indicators could be expressed in term s o f quantity, quality, and tim eliness as defined below:

Q uantity Indicator - Indicates the num ber o f units or volum e o f output delivered during a given period o f time.
Q uality Indicator - indicates how well the output is delivered and how they are perceived by clients. Com m on quality P I include accuracy or com pleteness, safety and client
satisfaction.
Tim eliness - indicates a m easure o f the availability o f the output as and when required by the client. Tim eliness indicators m a y include turnaround time, average waiting time,
Column (3): Targets - Indicate the performance targets for each Performance Indicator broken down in the four quarters of the year.
Column (4): Alloted Budget - Cost provision for the year corresponding each program.
Column (5): Division/Department/Section Responsible - Indicate the sub-unit of the division or department responsible for each program and performance targets
Column (6): Actual Accomplishments - Indicate the actual accomplishments at the end of each quarter. These are achievements of the quarterly targets to achieve the annual total
Column (7): Rating - Indicate the rating in terms of Quantity, Quality, and/or Timeliness and the Average based in accordance to the SPMS of the University.
Column (8): Remarks - Indicate any explanatory note or statements with regard to the indicators or targets and/or accomplishment of the targets.