Page 274 - Теория кавитации

normal pressure and temperature far from the nucleus, it turns back into a proton and an
electron, and, thus, the former atom is restored [53].
Thus, we are convinced that the atoms also collapse - explode, cavitating. From the
conclusions that we set forth in this remark, we can conclude: “The phenomenon of
cavitation, as we propose to be worthy of one of the fundamental forces of nature, if
before this remark we implemented this idea for photons and electrons, now, after this
remark we are convinced that the process of formation, disintegration of the atom itself
can be interpreted as a cavitation phenomenon”.
The remaining question that needs to be considered in this connection is the
following: what type of cavitions should the atom itself be classified - ci1 or ci2?
According to the definition, ci1 is for the atomic-nucleon level and, basically, this
type is treated as an elementary particle, and ci2 is a quasi-molecular level and molecular
level. The atom is in an intermediate position, but, if we take into account the process of
neutronization in the previous paragraph, then the atom, all the same, should be
considered a cavition type of ci1, possibly with some reservations.
Specialists in elementary particle physics and nuclear physics, of course, explain
this situation by describing the reactions of EP to each other. For our part, we add by
distinguishing: a) the natural basis of these transformation reactions; b) energy source
for feeding these reactions. Cavitation is one of the reasons and fundamentals for item
a; and the energy of “metamorphosis - miraculous transformation” - one of the possible
sources of energy, which corresponds to paragraph b.
That is why we propose to name the newly discovered atom status in this way “the
cavitional model of the atom - CMA” or atomic cavitionic model - ACM. Obviously,
the atom-bubble, atom-cavition sound strange, but the main thing is not the name, but
the understanding of the inner world of the atom and its structure, in a word - the
existence of the atom.

3.8 Conclusion: there are questions with answers, there are still unanswered

According to the results of the seminars, a number of articles were published, here
4 of them [51]-[52], [54]-[55]. Let's answer 2 questions from A. Sarsenov, one question
concerns the existence of antiparticles: proceeding from the dialectical law, if there is
an EP, then its antiparticle must also exist, how do you know and how will you justify
its existence? The answer: it is that the cavitations themselves play the role of EP, having
come close to each of them, therefore they are not created to answer the question of the
existence of EP. For example, ci1 e is a cavition corresponding to an electron, therefore,
if it is necessary to cavitate a positron - an anti-electron, we denote the corresponding
cavitation ci1 p and begin to work with it, especially not caring about its name.
Next question: As you say, cavitation is an element that gives movement, mobility
to substances, so is it possible to compare it with the muon? Answer: Yes, the muon is
a special short-lived particle, but the experts themselves could not substantiate its special
status to the interactions - weak and strong (H. Yukawa) [56]-[57]. In fact, a muon is a
273