Page 199 - Proceeding of Atrans Young Researcher's Forum 2019_Neat
P. 199
“Transportation for A Better Life:
Smart Mobility for Now and Then”
23 August 2019, Bangkok, Thailand
residents. However, it can be seen that the ratings for
safety by the residents aged 69-78 are low which "Habal-Habal" Rating vs. Age
could probably be due to the reason that some 5
tricycles are too exposed and too fast which for older 4.5
people can cause anxiety. Another reason could be is 3.5 4
that they have already experienced a lot of accidents 3 Comfort
in this mode. Average Rating 2.5 Travel Time
1.5 2 Cleanliness
Jeepney Rating vs. Age 1
0.5 Safety
5 0 Connectivity
4.5
4
Average Rating 2.5 Comfort Fig. 12. Habal-Habal Rating vs. Age
3.5
Age
3
Travel Time
2
1.5
Cleanliness
1
0.5 Safety As seen from the fig. 12, ages 19-28 gave
0 Connectivity high ratings for habal-habal mainly because of their
current ages which give them more stamina,
endurance and more flexibility to choose a mode
Age such as this mode which is very fast and very
exposed. The safety rating is evidently higher for this
Fig. 11. Jeepney Rating vs. Age age range because of the aforementioned reason.
Oppositely, safety is rated lowest for those aged 69-
As seen from the fig. 11, the comfort 78 because there are more safe alternatives instead
attribute stands out again for having a high grade. of a speeding motorcycle.
This could be because jeepneys have a high capacity
that could accommodate a large number of people
and the commuters of all ages might prefer this Private Car Rating vs. Age
situation because they are able to seat comfortably. 5
Especially those from the commuters aged 69-78 as 4.5
they would prefer to be able to sit down comfortably 3.5 4
on a public vehicle which a jeepney provides. It can 3 Comfort
also be noticed that the connectivity among all the Average Rating 2.5
age ranges is rated very low which could probably 2 Travel Time
be because jeepneys have designated routes and are 1.5 Cleanliness
not flexible when it comes to the desired destinations 0.5 1 Safety
of the passengers. 0 Connectivity
Age
Fig. 13. Private Car Rating vs. Age
As seen from the figure, the participants
aged 69-78 evidently prefers the safety private cars
provide more than the other ranges. This could
probably because at this age, these residents would
prefer modes wherein they are safely seated inside
an enclosed vehicle, free from outside factors.
Another seemingly highly rated factor by all ages is
the cleanliness in private cars. The main reason
174