Page 20 - Property Rights in the Philippine A Time and Cost Study_July 2017
P. 20

INSIGHTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


               Promoting Systematic Adjudication

                     Systematic  Adjudication  is  more  cost-effective  than  Sporadic  Adjudication.  By  approaching  lot
               occupants in their neighborhoods, DENR (and its LGU partners, where there are any), will able to accept
               and  process  applications  in  batches.  Though  it  may  take  longer  to  process  one  batch  versus  one
               application, batch processing means issuance of more Residential Free Patents.

                     Because neighbors are able to compare what they are being asked to submit, and how much they
               pay, there is more transparency in Systematic Adjudication - and therefore lesser opportunities for unofficial
               charging of fees or “package deals”.  This translates to lower cost for titling.

                     Systematic Adjudication requires preliminary evaluation of lot disposition data and surveys.  This is
               a major source of delay in the process, which is the next recommendation - finding ways to access DENR
               data faster.


               Improving Access to DENR Data

                       Improving access to DENR data would address significant delays in both Systematic and Sporadic
               Adjudication, and in CENRO Processing.

                       Fortunately, DENR is already working on this. In LAMP, they developed an information system
               known as Land Administration and Management System (LAMS). It has two components: Public Land
               Application (PLA), which is based in the CENROs; and Inspection, Verification and Approval of Surveys
               (IVAS), which is in the Regional Offices. To populate the databases used in these systems, DENR tried to
               outsource  a  Data  Conversion  and  Database  Build-up  project.  Top  management  recently  decided  to
               implement this effort “by administration” - meaning, it will be done by the field offices.

                       This  nationwide  system  is  being  managed  by  Engr.  Warlito  Quirimit  of  the  Land  Management
               Bureau,  assisted  by  programmers  who  used  to  work for  a  software  company  called  Crevelle  (LAMP’s
               original contractor).

                       In  an  orientation  to  FEF  partners,  Engr.  Quirimit  revealed  that  this  year  (2017),  his  team  will
               purchase and set up five desktop computers in each CENRO. They will also provide the CENROs and
               PENROs with funds for connectivity to the Internet. The specific means of connectivity, which could range
               from DSL to WiFi dongles, will be determined by each CENRO/PENRO. Regional Offices would be linked
               to the LMB main office by leased lines.

                       Engr. Quirimit’s team has Regional Coordinators who are assigned to look after the implementation
               of LAMS in their areas and relay problems to them in place of a Help Desk. These tasks are in addition to
               the designated Coordinator’s regular assignment.

                       The researchers could not find an overall Information Systems Plan for LAMS. Researchers have
               also  heard  complaints  and  questions  from  CENRO  employees  and  clients  (specifically,  Geodetic
               Engineers) about the operation of LAMS PLA and IVAS.

                       One CENRO, for example, revealed that they re-encoded records when a new version of LAMS
               PLA was installed. When asked about this, Engr. Quirimit said there is a module to convert databases
               across different versions of LAMS PLA. Apparently that information had not been communicated to the
               CENRO.

                       It seems to the researchers that LMB needs to have a more robust, transparent, well-communicated
               ICT Management Plan. One that would address common issues in ICT project management, and specific



                                                                                                           20
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25