Page 55 - Composing Processes and Artistic Agency
P. 55

44  The topography of composing work

            habitual during training and professional practice: “All self-development
            depends on the mastering of appropriate responses to others; an indivi-
            dual who has to be ‘different’ from all others has no chance of reflexively
            developing a coherent self-identity. […] The individual is unable to dis-
            cover a self-identity ‘sober’ enough to conform to the expectations of
            others in his social milieux” (Giddens 1991: 201). Frequent references to
            established composers in history, well-known philosophers, music theorists
            or musicologists and the terms connected to them are neither superficial
            rituals of self-projection nor unreflective reproductions of disseminated
            educational content. Rather, they are the expression of a multilayered
                                     4
            process of identity-building. The appropriation of, and participation in,
            theoretical discourses is here a typical sign of an individual’sability to
            join in and of his or her integration into a collective (see Wenger 2002:
            55–57). One composer we interviewed discussed a composition as “more
            of an offer to the listeners, to take it with them on their search or on
            their way, so that through their experience, interest and intuition they can
            become co-creators”. This immediately recalls Umberto Eco’s (1962/1989)
            theory of the open work of art or Roland Barthes’ (1968/2005: 142–148)
            interpretation of the reader as a second author. However, we are not talking
            here about “copies” or “plagiarism”, but rather about the appropriation of
            ideas, convictions, figures of thought and rhetorical turns of phrase that iden-
            tify a person as a member of a practice community.
              Many of the interviewed composers regularly write down their thoughts
                                       5
            and ideas on works in progress. Christof Dienz confirms: “Often I even write
            a ‘prose score’ in the prep phase. I write it in words because if I don’t, I’ll
            forget what I was thinking, […] just as a reminder.” Judith Unterpertinger
            also says, “There is much that I jot down in words, i.e. narratively”. Looked
            at closely, these writing processes (or rather these accessories) are not a simple
            writing-down of what has already been thought. Rather, diaries are one of
            the many places where ideas are developed. When composers pursue an
            impulse to write and follow an idea, a thought or an association, they trigger
            new sequences of ideas or associations, which are often expressed concretely
            in drawings as well as language. The goal of writing is then primarily practical:
            to make progress in the composition process. For instance, Marko Ciciliani
            observes:

                Ultimately, concepts are important to me because they radiate such
                motivation and fascination. But then I have to be able to transpose
                them to music. And that’s basically the decisive moment. If I start, and I
                realise, okay, I’m capable of conveying this topic in an artistic form that
                preserves its fascination and its interest, then I’ve got past the critical
                point.

            Consequently, writing becomes a generative and creative activity integrated
            into the composition process. The Notate contain various semiotic forms –
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60