Page 302 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 302

272  •  Crisis in Higher Education



               2. Up-front design: If universities invest, then faculty must be willing to
                  take the time to create a multifaceted pedagogy that accommodates dif-
                  ferent learning styles. Universities must support these efforts, keeping
                  in mind that the goals are twofold: improve learning and reduce costs.
               3. Three-credit hours does not mean three hours of face time: Universities
                 and faculty must understand the circumstances under which students
                 learn best and work hard to create those circumstances, rather than
                 churning out three hours of face-to-face lectures each week. The solu-
                 tion must be more than substituting lower paid instructional faculty for
                 tenured faculty.


              Some readers may brush aside these recommendations as an attempt to
             industrialize higher education, and there is truth in their claim. Creating
             standardization and taking advantage of economies of scale can improve
             learning and cut costs. But industrialization only makes sense when
             knowledge changes slowly over time, so the learning infrastructure that
             supports  education  can  be  created  once  and  adjusted  as  needed—the
             essence of continuous improvement. So industrialization is most appro-
             priate in general education courses and should be nonexistent in PhD
             courses. Consider the following subjects, which are part of general educa-
             tion or disciplinary core: introduction to statistics, college algebra, intro-
             duction to sociology, and English composition. It makes sense to invest
             time and money to create a sophisticated set of learning tools because the
             contents of these courses change slowly, in spite of what book publish-
             ers and some faculty may claim. PhD seminars, which focus on cutting-
             edge knowledge, still require doctoral students to read the latest research
             papers with a critical eye and ultimately to assimilate the best of these
             ideas into undergraduate and graduate education.
              Administrators and faculty may argue that students taking general edu-
             cation or disciplinary core courses, taught using this industrial approach,
             miss the opportunity to learn from scholars who are at the leading edge
             of knowledge. They believe that these scholars can bring great insight to
             introductory courses that instructional faculty cannot. They attempt to
             achieve this in one of two ways:


               1. Assign the best scholars: In a semester, the best scholar is assigned
                 to teach one or two of the many sections offered for a particular
                 general education course with the balance being taught by instruc-
                 tional faculty and graduate teaching assistants. Depending on the
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307