Page 134 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 134

The French Diplomats  121

              François-Poncet was scathing in his reaction to simon’s assessment of
            Hitler. the ambassador conceded that Hitler could be gracious and could
            give the impression of being moved by honorable sentiments. But Fran-
            çois-Poncet warned that sir John had not taken the full measure of the
            man. Hitler was also a person of “brutal arrogance, [who was] violent, de-
            voured by the madness of [his own] greatness, . . . obstinate, stubborn and
            mean to the point of madness.” simon had placed his trust in a “primitive
            brute.”  François-Poncet seems to have forgotten that too often he himself
                  56
            had dwelled on the apparently attractive features of Hitler.
              When François-Poncet returned to Berlin on June 23, 1935, after a one-
            month stay in Paris, he was amazed at the change in the political climate.
            When he left, the mood had been downcast, mainly because the league of
            Nations had condemned Germany for rearming in violation of the treaty of
            Versailles. Moreover, it had seemed that several european powers—France,
            the soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and romania—were planning to isolate
            and encircle Germany. But by the end of June, the atmosphere was entirely
            different. the British government, which sympathized with Germany’s re-
            sentment of the punitive measures of the treaty of Versailles, had signed
            a naval agreement with Hitler that allowed Germany to build a navy 35
            percent as large as the royal Navy. the British government looked upon
            the treaty as a way of limiting German rearmament, but the Germans were
            pleased to be permitted to exceed the limits set by the treaty of Versailles,
            and they also saw the agreement as a first step toward creating an alliance
            with Great Britain against France and the soviet Union. But the French
            and italians were disturbed because they had been kept in the dark during
            the negotiations. “the naval accord of london,” François-Poncet noted,
            “had banished the clouds [in Germany] and had brought back the sun.” the
            Nazis considered the agreement a complete transformation of the interna-
            tional situation because Germany was now no longer isolated. it enhanced
            Hitler’s prestige, and his followers were now confident that within a few
            years their country would reemerge as “the foremost military power in the
            world.”  Writing after World War ii, François-Poncet argued that all along
                  57
            British political leaders had underestimated the military threat posed by the
            Nazis and that they therefore bore much responsibility for the West’s failure
            to stop the rearmament of Germany. 58
              days after his return to Berlin, the ambassador received an unsettling
            report  from  General  renondeau  on  Germany’s  expansionist  plans.  the
            general had been sent a remarkably candid account of those plans by Major
            Friedrich-Carl rabe von Pappenheim, a soldier who within another eight
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139