Page 27 - The Economist20171214
P. 27

The Economist December 16th 2017                                                         United States 27
       2 rier to diversifying the region’s economy.  site—a category that includes coal and nuc-  Mr Perry’s before it imploded. Bob Murray,
        The likelier a young man is to believe he  lear plants, and excludes renewables,  one such boss, implored the White House
        will one day have a six-figure coal job like  which rely on weather, and natural gas  to use emergency powers to save several
        his father, the less likely he is to train for  plants, which get their energy through  coal plantsfrom bankruptcy. MrTrump de-
        anythingelse.                      pipelines. He cast this as a way to counter-  clined, but several weeks later Mr Perry re-
           In Appalachia, coal is not just a com-  act subsidies provided to renewables, and  leased his proposal. The former acting
        modity; it is a cultural totem. The chamber  to keep America’s electricity grid reliable  chairman of the FERC does not believe the
        of commerce building in Williamson,  and resilient. In a letter to the FERC he not-  proposal was intended to benefit any spe-
        tucked away in West Virginia’s south-west  ed that during the Polar Vortex (a period of  cificcompanyordonors. MsBrownell says
        corner, is built from 65 tons of coal mined  sustained cold) in 2014, coal plants on the  that “as part ofa long-term economic strat-
        from the nearby Winifrede Seam. T-shirts  brink of closure were kept online to meet  egy [Mr Perry’s proposal] makes literally
        and mesh caps for sale in West Virginia’s  the demand for heat. The commission  no sense, no matterwhat party you are.”
        main airport advertise that the wearer is a  asked formore time to thinkitover. MrPer-  It is hard to think of many more mis-
        “Coal Miner’s Wife”. Licence plates in Ken-  ry grudgingly agreed, setting a new dead-  guided public policies than  subsidising
        tucky proclaim the drivers “Friends of  line ofJanuary10th.          coal production. Askingthe FERC to favour
        Coal”, and in 2014 the state’s senior sena-                          one fuel over another also tinkers with a
        tor, Mitch McConnell, used as a campaign  Subsidyand perfidy          market mechanism that has served the
        slogan “Coal. Guns. Freedom.”      In hisproposal, MrPerryneglected to men-  country fairly well. In fact, these policies
           Many see coal as evidence of divine fa-  tion that at several plants massive coal  make sense only as a kind of political the-
        vour: He put it under American soil for  piles froze solid, and in much of the coun-  atre, according to which both the adminis-
        Americans to exploit as they see fit, not to  try wind power and energy-efficiency  tration and its many supporters agree to
        keep in the ground to please pencil-necked  measures helped meet peak demand. And  pretend that it is possible to return to some
        environmentalists. Many families have at  a report from his own department found  mythical glorious past, when brawny
        least one member who has worked in the  that the main reason coal-fired plants were  American men, rather than machines or
        mines or related industries. Coal provided  being retired was not subsidies for wind  foreigners, smelted steel, mined coal and
        jobs for people with a strong work ethic  and solar, but “the advantaged economics  built things on assembly lines. That world
        but little formal education. One West Vir-  of natural-gas-fired generation”. If the  is gone—and even in coal country, some
        ginia banker, a pillar of his community,  FERC adopted Mr Perry’s rule, it would  have come to grips with its absence.
        grows misty-eyed recalling his father, who  amount to one of the biggest government  The fourmen in Welch demolishing the
        left school when he was 13 and became a  interventions in energy markets for de-  old factory (to turn it into an arts centre, no
        repairman in local mines, earning a six-fig-  cades, and risks frightening investors by  less) are preciselythe sortwho would once
        ure salary that supported a family of six.  putting a thumb on the scale for coal and  have worked in the mines: healthy, dili-
        These jobs were not only well paid, they  introducingpolicy uncertainty.  gent, reliable. All four come from multi-
        were also important—coal powered Amer-  Some see a darker motive in Mr Perry’s  generational mining families. But the in-
        ica’s expansion and industrialisation—and  proposal—and indeed in Mr Trump’s fond-  dustry holds little appeal for them. Gary,
        dangerous. The men who went “down the  ness for coal. Nora Brownell, a Republican  the smallest, fears being sent into small,
        mines” had a similar band-of-brothers ca-  ex-FERC commissioner appointed by  narrow spaces. PJ worries about safety.
        maraderie to men at war.           George W. Bush, calls it “cash for cronies”;  “It’s not like it was,” says Ramon, the big-
           Taken literally, which is usually a bad  she believes it was intended to help coal  gest and oldest of the quartet. “Those jobs
        idea, the administration’s policies are in-  firms and bosses that donated heavily to  aren’t coming back, and even if they did,
        tended to revive this lost world. First, it  Mr Trump’s presidential campaign, and to  you don’t know how longthey’ll stay.” 7
        wants to repeal the Clean Power Plan, an
        Obama-era initiative intended to limit car-
        bon emissions from power plants, which
        the president has called “stupid” and “job-
        killing”. “Did you see what I did to that?”
        he asked a crowd in September. “Boom,
        gone.” This pleased the audience but was
        false, for the plan has not yet taken effect.
        The Supreme Court blocked implementa-
        tion while it considered lawsuits filed by
        multiple statesarguingthatthe EPA had ex-
        ceeded its authority in enacting the plan.
        Mr Trump’s repeal proposal may also face
        legal challenges. In any event, the EPA can-
        not simply decline to regulate emissions.
        The “endangerment finding” of 2009 ob-
        liges it to find “the best system of emission
        reduction” for carbon. The previous ad-
        ministration thoughtthe Clean PowerPlan
        fitted the bill. Even if the current adminis-
        tration successfully repeals the plan, it will
        stillneedtocomeupwiththebestpossible
        way to regulate carbon emissions.
           Second, in late September Rick Perry,
        the energy secretary, proposed that the
        Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
        (FERC) should, in effect, subsidise power
        plants that have a 90-day fuel supply on  It’s the hope that thrills
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32