Page 25 - QDigitz
P. 25

Q!Digitz                                         Vol 1            Aug 2019







      This  would  ensure  the  boundary  of  operation
      remains  the  same  and  the  parameters  are  also
      remained  the  same,  as  we  measure  the  e ort
      impact.
      In this model, we measure the outcome produced
      and e ort spent together.


      We  can  use  the  unit  of  e ort  spent  towards         This costing will also help in knowing when is the
      outcome  for  productivity.  However,  the  outcome        cut-o   period  by  which  the  RPA  investment  will
      itself can have a multi-dimension in such cases we         start  giving  bene ts.  This  method  is  simpler  and
      may  or  may  not  use  a  composite  weightage.  The      provides better clarity in results. However, what if ,
      below  given  picture  depicts  a  case  of  Application   the RPA focus itself is not “Cost Reduction” but to
      maintenance  service,  how  the  E ort  computation        improve  compliance  ,  Improve  service  Quality,
      model with outcome can be used.
                                                                 Improve  Turn  Around  Time,  in  such  cases  these
                                                                 changes has to be converted as Cost  gure to add
                                                                 to saving.


                                                                 In  RPA,  everyone  agrees  that  it  pays  bene t,  but
                                                                 it's  di cult  to  evaluate  exactly  to  what  extent  it
                                                                 pays  back.  This  happens  because  not  the  entire
                                                                 service  is  getting  applied  with  RPA  ,  but  often  a
                                                                 portion  of  the  work.  Hence  data  collection  itself
                                                                 has  many  challenges,  hence  the  above  given
      In  this  outcome  and  e ort  based  productivity         methods  can  help  us  focus  macro  number  to  get
      approach,  we  can  start  measuring  them  after  3       the right feelers.
      months of operation. We can either apply a by the
      cost of human to account the bot, as few works by
      junior  resource  the  bot  has  taken  over  or  with     Productivity in Upcoming days
      another  method  of  one  license  is  standard  9
      hours.  Alternatively,  if  a  bot  runs  for  24  hrs     The  next  phase  of  measuring  productivity  can
      without  interruption,  then  we  may  take  3  person     touch on how the licenses are utilized, how do we
      equivalents.  Under  any  case,  we  are  trying  to       improve  the  processes   rst  to  an  optimal  stage
      compare  the  outcome  produced  by  the  unit  of         and then apply RPA. We would move to speed up
      e ort , before RPA and after RPA.                          and  reduce  the  RPA  scripting  process  and  start
                                                                 measuring the development practices too.
      In  a  better  way,  we  can  go  for  cost  reduction  by
      introducing RPA services. In this model, it did the        RPA  itself  will  have  many  improvement  measures
      work  before  the  RPA  period  for  a  scope  with  a     to  aid  in  building  productivity  through  RPA.  The
      certain cost and after RPA it reduces the cost. The        Simpler way for now is to concentrate on cost for
      cost  computation  here  will  consider  all  the  cost    similar  quality  in  a  scope  ,  before  and  after  RPA.
      involved in Initial and Operational cost of the bot.       Based on which we can increase the coverage for
                                                                 RPA across platforms.





                                                         DigitQ.in
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28