Page 128 - [Uma_Sekaran]_Research_methods_for_business__a_sk(BookZZ.org)
P. 128

112  THE RESEARCH PROCESS

                             3. There will be a significant positive correlation between access to information
                               and chances for promotion to top-level positions.
                             4. The more the sex-role stereotyping, the less the access to critical information
                               for women.
                             5. Sex-role stereotyping and access to critical information will both significantly
                               explain the variance in promotional opportunities for women to top-level
                               positions.


            MANAGERIAL ADVANTAGE


                             At this juncture, it becomes easy to follow the progression of research from the
                             first stage when managers sense the broad problem area, to preliminary data
                             gathering (including literature survey), to developing the theoretical framework
                             based on the literature review and guided by experience and intuition, to for-
                             mulating hypotheses for testing.
                               It is also clear that once the problem is defined, a good grasp of the four dif-
                             ferent types of variables enlarges the understanding of managers as to how multi-
                             ple factors impinge on the organizational setting. Knowledge of how and for what
                             purpose the theoretical framework is developed and the hypotheses are generated
                             enables the manager to be an intelligent judge of the research report submitted by
                             the consultant. Likewise, knowledge of what significance means, and why a given
                             hypothesis is either accepted or rejected, helps the manager to persist in or desist
                             from following hunches which, while making good sense, do not work. If such
                             knowledge is absent, many of the findings through research will not make much
                             sense to the manager and decision making will bristle with confusion.



                             SUMMARY

                             In this chapter we examined the four types of variables—dependent, independent, mod-
                             erating, and intervening. We also discussed how the theoretical framework is developed
                             and how testable hypotheses are generated therefrom. We saw examples where the same
                             variable can be a dependent, independent, moderating, or intervening, depending on the
                             situation. We also explained when a null hypothesis would be accepted or rejected, based
                             on whether or not the results of hypothesis testing meet the significance test. Futhermore,
                             we also briefly discussed the test for hypothesis validation in qualitative research. In the
                             next chapter we will examine the basic research design issues.

                                 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS AND POINTS TO PONDER


                             1. “Because literature survey is a time-consuming exercise, a good, in-depth interview
                               should suffice to develop a theoretical framework.” Discuss this statement.
                             2. There is an advantage in stating the hypothesis both in the null and in the alternate; it
                               adds clarity to our thinking of what we are testing. Explain.
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133