Page 116 - 72193
P. 116

88
 ו קרפ
                                              th
 םייח ץפח
 Chafetz Chayim  הרימשה תבוח סרטנוק  .וֹנוֹשְׁל ןאָכּ דַע ,)שׁוֹדָקַּה ַח ּ ֹכַה שָׁלֱחֶנ לוֹכָיְבִכְו ,וֹבּ   הֶכוֹז םָדָאָה ןֶבּ ןיֵאְו ,שׁוֹדָקַּה אוּהַה רוּבֵּדַּל םיִאְמַּטְמוּ םֵהָה   םיִאֵמְטַּה םירִוּבִּדַּה תֶא הֶלֵּאָה תוֹאֵמְטַּה תוֹחוּר תוֹמיִדּקְַמ   ,םיִשׁוֹדקְ  םירִוּבִּדּ  ךְָכּ  רַחַא  םָדָאָה  ןֶבּ  איִצוֹמ  רֶשׁ
  Kuntres Chovat HaShemirah      הרימשה תבוח סרטנוק
 7  chapter                              ח קרפ
 th
 most certainly his speech is not unrestrained and he disciplines    םַגֲה ,הרָיִמְשַּׁה תַבוֹח וֹמְצַע לַע לֵבּקְַמ וֹניֵאֶשׁ םָדָאָהְדּ .ג
 himself not to say anything that is contrary to the Will of Hashem
 Yitbarach, or that he is a very simple person and he does not    יוּבּרִ יֵנְפִּמ וֹנוֹשְׁלִבּ לַשְׁכִנ יאַדַּוְבֶּשׁ ,רֵעַשְׁמ ןוֹבָנ שׁיִא לָכֶּשׁ
 know which types of speech are forbidden.  However, when it    תוֹשֲׂעַל רֵכוֹז וֹניֵא םוֹקָמ לָכִּמ ,םוֹיַּה לָכּ רֵבִּדֶּשׁ םירִָבְדַּה
 comes to man himself, he must motivate himself to guard his
 mouth and his speech (lit., tongue) from becoming unrestrained,    אָבַּהְל לַע םיִנָפּ לָכּ לַע וֹמְצַע לַע לֵבּקְַלוּ ןֶהיֵלֲע הָבוּשְׁתּ
 which Gd forbid would make him appear as a Rasha in the eyes    בוּתָכֶּשׁ וֹמְכּ ,הָבוּשְׁתַּה רַקִּע וּהֶז יִכּ ,ןֶהָבּ לֵשָׁכִּהְל אלֶֹּשׁ
 of Hashem Yitbarach.  This reason alone should be sufficient for
 anyone who is serious to accept upon himself the discipline of    וּלִּפֲאַו ."'ה לֶא בֹשָׁיְו 'וֹגְו וֹכּרְַדּ עָשׁרָ בֹזֲעַי" :)'ז ה"נ הָיְעַשְׁי(
 guarded speech.
               רֵכוֹז  וֹניֵא  ,'יִפ ּדֹ  וּנרְַבִּדּ'  ,רַמאֹיְו  ,'וּנְמַשָׁא'  ,רַמאֹי  םִא
 I also wanted to bring here something I wrote elsewhere that is
 relevant to this topic.  Chazal have said (Gemara Shabbat 119b):    .ןֶהָבּ  ריִהָז  תוֹיְהִל  לָלְכּ  וֹמְצַע  לַע  לֵבּקְַמ  וֹניֵאְו  ,םָתוֹא
 “What is the basis for the continuing existence of the universe?    לַשְׁכִנ םִא וּלִּפֲא ,הרָיִמְשַּׁה תַבוֹח וֹמְצַע לַע לֵבּקְַמֶּשְׁכּ לָבֲא
 [Answer] “On the words spoken by the (innocent) children of
 Beit Rabban.”  (Regarding this statement of Chazal) Abaye asked    תוֹשֲׂעַלּ הַמ לַע עדֵַיְו ,ןירִוּפְס ויָלוּקְלקִ וּיְהִי ,ןֶהָבּ וֹנוֹשְׁלִבּ
 Rava, [our text version reads - Rav Pappa asked Abaye] “What   .הָבוּשְׁתּ
 of you and me?” (i.e., Isn’t the value of our learning sufficient
 to help sustain the existence of the world?)  He responded, (The    םיִמָעְפּ הָמַּכּ וֹרוּבִּדִּמ אֵצוֹי ,םָדָאָה לֶשׁ וֹלֵגּרְֶה ברֵֹמ .ד
 learning of children is superior to ours because) “The learning
 of those who have sinned is not comparable to the learning of    אוּהְו[ ןֵוַּכְּתִמְבּ אלֶֹּשׁ ,וֹתָאָנוֹא וֹא םָדָא לֶשׁ וֹתוּנְגּ ןַיְנִע
 those who have no sin.”  Even though the learning of these holy
 Amora’im was most certainly purely for the sake of Heaven and    לַלְכִבּ ןֵכּ םַגּ אוּה .]ל"ַנַּה םירִוּסֲא םירִוּבִּדּ יֵנְיְנִע לָכְבּ ןיִדַּה
 most certainly there was no Lashon Hara or Rechilut or other    'םיִיַּח ץֵפָח' תַחיִתְפִבּ רָאֹבְמַכּ ,םירִָבְדּ תַאָנוֹאְו ערָָה ןוֹשָׁל
 forbidden speech spoken by them, but at worst only a hint to
 an allusion of Lashon Hara, nevertheless they said that because    .םָשׁ ןֵיַּע ,ן"ַבְּמרַָהְו ם"ַבְּמרַָה ירְֵבִדִּמוּ ,רוֹכָזְדּ הֵשֲׂע תַוְצִמְבּ
 at  some  time  in  their  lives  they  may  have  stumbled  and  said    אלֹ ,הרָיִמְשַּׁה תַבוֹח וֹשְׁפַנ לַע לֵבּקְַמֶּשְׁכּ ,ןֵכּ ןיֵאֶשּׁ הַמ
 something that alluded to a hint of Lashon Hara and in so doing
 the quality of  the words  they spoke  became spoiled and their    ,ויָתָפְשׂ אָצוֹמְבּ שׁיִגּרְַי ,םיִמָעְפִל הרֶקְִי םִא ףַאְו .הֶזָל אוֹבָי
 Torah learning became less holy.
                                    .ןֵקַּתְל הֶארְִיְו
 Then  necessarily  our  speech  and  the  holiness  of  our  learning
 compared to theirs is like a midget compared to a giant.  As long    ,םירְִבּדְַמ לֶשׁ הָיִּסֵנְכּ םוֹקָמ לָכְבּ יוּצָמֶּשׁ ,ַעוּדָי הֵנִּה .ה
 as we continue to defile our speech with Lashon Hara and Rechilut
 and  comparably  forbidden  speech,  what  possible  sanctity  can    לַע הֶלוֹע וֹניֵאְו ,וֹחוּר לַע הֶלוֹעֶשּׁ הַמ רֵבּדְַמ דָחֶא לָכְו
 reside in our learning?  Therefore, how great is the merit of one    יוּצָמוּ .רוּסָא וֹא רָתֻּמַּה רוּבִּדּ אוּה םִא בֹשְׁחַל לָלְכּ וֹתְּעַדּ
 who accepts upon himself the obligation of disciplined speech.
 For the more he increases his level of disciplined speech, the    לָכְו .רוּסָאָה רוּבִּדּ יקְֵלֶח לָכּ םָשׁ רֵבוֹדּ תַחַא הָעָשׁ ךְֶשֶׁמְבֶּשׁ





 97                                                                           104
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121