Page 120 - 72193
P. 120

92
 .םיִיַּח
 4
 ז קרפ
                                              th
 םייח ץפח
 Chafetz Chayim  .ןוֹשָׁלַּה דַיְבּ תֶוָמַּהְו  הרימשה תבוח סרטנוק  .םֵיּקְַל וֹשְׁפַנ לַעְו וֹבִּל לַע ברֶֶעְו  .הָבָשֲׁחַמַּהְו רוּבִּדַּה ַחֹכְבּ םיִיוּלְתֶּשׁ   ב"ל םירִָבְדּ( וּניִזֲאַה תַשׁרָָפְבּ אוּה שׁרָֹפְמ ארָקְִמ תֶמֱאֶבוּ   םָנְמָא ?הָּפרְָצְמ ןוֹשְׁל יאַמ ,הֶשֲׂעַמְל הָּבְשׁוֹח אוּה ךְוּרָבּ   שׁוֹדָקַּה ןיֵא ,רַמוֹל
  Kuntres Chovat HaShemirah      הרימשה תבוח סרטנוק
 th
 7  chapter                              ח קרפ
 ‘Shema’ that at the moment of “acceptance” (accepting “restraint”    םֵיּקְַמוּ ,תוְֹצִמַּה לֹע דיִמָתּ וֹתְּעדְַבּ ויָלָע שֵׁי הֶז ידְֵי לַע .ו
 and “discipline”) he must think that he accepts upon himself the
 responsibility to observe all of the words of Hashem Yitbarach    ירַָבְדּ תֶא םֶתְּמַשְׂו" :)ח"י א"י םירִָבְדּ( הרָוֹתַּבּ בוּתָכֶּשּׁ הַמ הֶזָבּ
 that are written in the Torah which automatically includes all of   .הָלְעַמְל יִתְּבַתָכֶּשׁ וֹמְכוּ ,"םֶכְבַבְל לַע הֶלֵּא
 the Laveen and Aseen that are contingent on a person’s speech
 and on his thoughts.  This is what Hashem Yitbarach commanded    וּיְהִי ,אוּה ךְוּרָבּ שׁוֹדָקַּהְל ךְרֵָבְמֶּשׁ ,ויָתוֹכרְִבוּ וֹתרָוֹתּ .ז
 man to accept each morning and night, to perform them within
 his heart and his soul.   הַמ .הָאְמֻטַּה ַחוּר ןֶהיֵלֲע הָכְשְׁמִנ אלֶֹּשׁ ,תוֹרוֹהְט הֶז ידְֵי לַע
 But truthfully this concept (this text) is explicit in perashat Ha'azinu    ,םירִוּסֲא םירִוּבִּדּ רֵבּדְַמוּ ,וירָוּבּדְִבּ ריִהָז וֹניֵאֶשְׁכּ ןֵכּ ןיֵאֶשּׁ
 (Devarim 32:46-47) “place your hearts (pay close attention) to
 all the words that I testify against you today, with which you are    וּלֵּא  תוֹחקְוֹל  תוֹאֵמְטַּה  תוֹחוּרְו  .ןֶהיֵלֲע  תֶפֶחרְַמ  הָאְמֻט
 to instruct your children, to be careful to perform all of the words    ,רֵבּדְַמֶּשׁ הָשּׁדְֻקַּה ירְֵבִדּ ןֶהָבּ ןיִאְמַּטְמוּ ,ןיִאֵמְטַּה םירִוּבִּדַּה
 of this Torah, for it is not an empty thing for you, it is your life.”
 Meaning, that they should instruct (command) their children to    ירְֵבִדּ  ירֲֵחַא  ליֵעְל  ויִתּקְַתְּעֶהְו  .שׁוֹדָקַּה  רַהֹּזַבּ  רָאֹבְמַכּ
 observe the entire Torah, including even the Laveen and Aseen    חַתְפּ :הָשָׁקַּבַּה - הָלִּפְתַּה רַחַא וּרְדִּס הֶז ליִבְשִׁבוּ .ם"ַבְּמרַָה
 that are contingent on the power of one’s speech and thought.
               אלֹ םִאְדּ .ערֵָמ יִנוֹשְׁל רֹצְנ :הָשָׁקַּבַּה רַחַא ,ךֶָתרָוֹתְבּ יִבִּל
 The Yetzer Hara implants (a false sense of) humility in man and
 (consequently)  he  thinks  that  this  (these  laws  that  pertain  to   .'וֹגְו יִבִּל חַתְפּ ,לֵלַּפְּתִהְל יאדְַכּ ןיֵא ,ערֵָמ וֹנוֹשְׁל רֹצְנִי
 man’s speech and thought) are applicable only to those men who
 are outstanding in their Torah but that they are not relevant to him    םִא יִנְבּ" :)'א 'ב יֵלְשִׁמ( יֵלְשִׁמְבּ בוּתָכֶּשּׁ הַמ הֶזָבּ םֵיּקְַי .ח
 since he is only an ordinary person.  Regarding this mindset, the    ךְוֹתְבּ םיִנוּפְצֶּשׁ וּנְיַהְדּ ."ךְָתִּא ן ֹּפְצִתּ יַתוְֹצִמוּ ירָָמֲא חַקִּתּ
 pasuk admonishes that this is not so, but rather they (these laws)
 are your very life and everyone needs life.  .וֹנוֹשְׁלִבּ לֵשָׁכִּי אלֶֹּשׁ ידְֵכּ ,ןֶהָבּ רֵהָזִּהְל וֹבִּל

 The  reason  we  singled  out  this  topic  of  one’s  obligation  to    תוְֹצִמַּה  לָכּ  ןֵהְו  ,הרָוֹתַּה  רֶפֵסִּמ  לוֹדָגּ  קֶלֵחֶשׁ  ַעוּדָי  .ט
 guard everything that is relevant to the power of one’s speech is
 because we have seen that the text itself (the Torah) particularly    וּניֵתוֹנוֲֹעַבּ ,ןָמוּיּקִ ןַיְנִע דֹאְמ יוּפרָ ,רוּבִּדַּה ַחֹכְבּ תוֹיוּלְתַּה
 emphasized  this  subject  of  “discipline”  in  its  admonition  to
 “guard your tongue” (Tehilim 34:14) and “one who guards his    רָבְכוּ .ךְרַָבְּתִי 'הַל דוֹבָכְל לָלְכּ וּנֶּניֵא הֶז רָבָדְו .םיִבּרַָה
 mouth and tongue,” (Mishle 21:23) implying that they need an    איִה ,ןיִשׁרְוֹדּ הָּל ןיֵאֶשׁ ,הָוְצִמֶּשׁ ,םידִיִסֲח רֶפֵסְבּ וּנָל ריִעֵה
 extra measure of protection and the reason is because (Mishle
 18:21) "life and death reside in one's tongue."   לֵפַּטְל הרָוֹתַּה וּנָתוֹא הָבְיִּח לוֹדָגּ בוּיִּחֶשׁ .הָוְצִמ תֵמ לַלְכִבּ

 Chazal have said (Gemara Kedushin 40b) that HaKadosh Baruch    .ןוֹיָזִּבְבּ חָנֻּמ הֶיְהִי אלֶֹּשׁ ידְֵכּ ,ריִזָנְו לוֹדָגּ ןֵהֹכְל וּלִּפֲא ,וֹבּ
 Hu adds a good thought to an accomplished deed, but HaKadosh    ןיִשְׁשׁוֹח ןיֵאֶשׁ ,ןוֹיָזִּבְבּ םיִחָנֻּמ ךְרַָבְּתִי 'ה ירְֵבִדֶּשְׁכּ ןֵכֶּשׁ לָכְו
 Baruch Hu does not add a bad thought to an accomplished deed.
 Ostensibly it should have said, HaKadosh Baruch Hu does not    .ןֶהיֵלֲע רֹבֲעַל אלֶֹּשׁ קֵזַּחְתִהְלוּ ןָבְבַּחְל בוּיִּחַה הָמַּכּ ,םֶהָל





 93                                                                           108
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125