Page 488 - COSO Guidance
P. 488

16    |   Risk Appetite — Critical to Success







        Validating appetite                               It’s also worth looking at emerging trends and considering
        There may be a sense that these discussions of business   whether appetite is sufficiently accommodating to them.
        modeling or other approaches will produce a complete   Taking a “what if” approach to assumptions about the
        view of appetite. Often, however, that view is based on what   future may reveal internal biases that emerged during the
        people believe the organizations should, or will, act on when   development of appetite. For example:
        considering risk in decision-making.
                                                          •  What if key talent needed to sustain growth is not
        One insightful approach to validating appetite is to apply the   available or not engaged?
        statements to a series of past decisions—in essence, back-
        testing the statements or boundaries in place. Organizations   •  What if the actual rate of innovative ideas pursued
        may also choose to back-test assumptions, such as those   exceeds our expectations?
        on how the business environment informs performance.
        This approach may reveal instances where decisions were   •  What if new business disruptors enter the market sooner
        made outside the intended guidance. There may have been   than expected?
        certain board or management judgments that considered
        the strategic opportunities available and led to a conscious   Each of these approaches may instill in management the
        decision to shift operations either above or below its normal   need to refine appetite to provide added insight for
        appetite. In addition, those making the decisions may have   decision-making.
        been displaying a form of bias if there were cultural factors
        that influenced those decisions.
                                                                  We suggest organizations develop a
        The boundaries set can also be compared to historical    plan to validate risk appetite, using the
        performance to understand the guidance offered in these      approaches developed within
                                                                          your organization.
        measures. Some organizations review measures from peer
        companies and industries to see if they have adopted an
        appetite that varies greatly from others. Some variation in
        appetite is typical as companies have different missions
        and visions and may have adopted a strategy that requires
        a higher or lower appetite to remain resilient to
        those changes.






































           c oso . or g
   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493