Page 636 - COSO Guidance
P. 636

5. Information, communication and reporting for ESG-related risks





               Table 5.2: External stakeholder groups, information and communication

                Stakeholder group  Example information needs          Example communication methods
                Investors       • Entity’s approach for managing significant   • Annual general meeting of shareholders
                Provide capital to   changes to the internal and external environment   • Annual report, risk filing or 10-K
                the entity with an    leading to ESG-related impacts or dependencies
                expectation of    • Understanding of how the entity identifies,   • Integrated report
                financial returns  assesses and manages its ESG-related risks    • Proxy
                                 (e.g., climate-related risks)6
                Suppliers       • Entity’s standards for suppliers which may include   • Supplier code of conduct
                Supply goods or    areas such as ethics, integrity, legal standards,   • Report card, including, for example, quality, delivery,
                services to the entity  compliance, health and safety and environment  quantity delivered, performance history, incident
                                • Supplier performance against the entity’s    report and comments
                                 ESG-related standards                • Management meetings7
                Customers       • Information on how the product was made    • Responsible marketing practices (e.g., promoting
                Purchases the    (e.g., ingredients, country of origin, factory   accurate facts about the product)
                entity’s goods or   information)                      • Product labeling (e.g., nutrition facts)
                services        • Information on how to use the product and
                                 whether it may impact the consumer’s health    • Licensed, certified or authorized retailers
                                                                       (e.g., pharmacists)
                                 and safety (e.g., side effects of pharmaceuticals)
                                                                      • Focus groups
                NGOs and        • Entity’s approach for mitigating against negative   • Annual general meeting of shareholders
                communities      impacts to NGO interests (e.g., deforestation from   • Integrated report
                Hold entities    palm oil extraction)
                accountable for   • Understanding of how the entity benefits the    • Sustainability report
                impacts on their   local and global environment and society    • Website
                interest groups   (e.g., volunteer hours, employee monetary    • One-on-one engagement or facilitated stakeholder
                (e.g., environment,   contributions to cancer research)  meetings
                society)


               Chapter 2 describes how an ESG materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement can provide insights into
               these issues and the potential risks that may arise. For some companies, particularly those in the extractives
               industries, failing to understand, engage and report on ESG issues or risks can exacerbate a risk or be a
               risk itself. A Harvard Business Review article documented a study of 19 publicly traded junior  gold-mining
                                                                                             a
               companies for which one-third of their market capitalization was found to be a function of their stakeholder
               relations. The article stated that refusing to engage with disagreeable protesters or activists is not always an
               effective strategy for managing social risk. The authors recommend establishing a process to understand the
               concerns and objectives of those opposing business activities rather than withdrawing, disengaging or refusing
               to comment. 8
               The example below details the California Public Employees’ Retirement Systems (CalPERS) approach to
               understanding stakeholder needs and integrating this into decision-making and reporting.


                     CalPERS engages stakeholders to understand their most pressing issues

                 In 2016, the California Public Employees’ Retirement Systems (CalPERS) conducted an external
                 stakeholder engagement to inform its upcoming strategic plan as well as identify challenges that may
                 threaten the organization or present barriers to reaching its goals and objectives.
                 CalPERS met with a variety of stakeholders, including employer associations, labor associations, pension
                 funds and state legislatures. From this engagement, CalPERS identified multiple areas for improving its
                 approach to engagement, such as being more aggressive on health care purchasing to reduce costs and
                 improve access to quality health care. The stakeholders also identified key challenges, including threats
                                                            9
                 to cybersecurity and the rising cost of health care.  These concerns were incorporated in CalPERS’ new
                                                                               10
                 strategic plan, which was then communicated back out to stakeholders.











               . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
               a   A junior mining company is small company that is developing or seeking to develop a natural resource deposit or field.
               Enterprise Risk Management | Applying enterprise risk management to environmental, social and governance-related risks  •  October 2018  89
   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641