Page 84 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 84

Chapter 7: Advanced Imaging: Spinal Surgery  79

                                                                  material (which is hyperdense to the spinal cord) (Figure 7.12). CT
                                                                  is very sensitive to small amounts of mineralization but if the herni­
                                                                  ated material is not mineralized it may not be detected. Additionally,
                                                                  if there is little epidural fat (high spinal cord to vertebral canal
                                                                  ratio), as seen in small breed dogs, there may be insufficient con­
                                                                  trast to detect nonmineralized material (Figure 7.13).
                                                                    Another confounding issue is when there are multiple herniated
                                                                  discs, as it may not be possible to determine which is the active
                                                                  lesion when there is no contrast ring. Attenuation of the contrast
                                                                  ring indicates spinal cord swelling that can point to the acute lesion.
                                                                  As spinal cord swelling can also be related to prognosis, this addi­
                                                                  tional information may justify the use of CT myelography over
                                                                  unenhanced CT [30,50].
                                                                    Several studies have concluded that plain CT is as effective as
                                                                  myelography in detecting intervertebral disc herniation, with a
                                                                  sensitivity of 81–97% [25,26,31,51,52]. Unfortunately, although
























               Figure 7.10  A ventrodorsal post‐myelogram radiograph shows attenuation
               of the right contrast column over a greater length than the left contrast col­  Figure  7.12  Transverse CT at the cranial aspect of L2 shows hyperdense
               umn. Based on the paradoxical contrast obstruction, this indicates that the   (mineralized) intervertebral disc material in the left vertebral canal causing
               extradural lesion (confirmed extradural on the lateral view) is on the left   compression of the spinal cord. This lesion is clearly evident without the
               side. This finding was confirmed at surgery.       need for intravenous or intrathecal contrast medium.



                                                     A                    B                    C

















               Figure 7.11  Ventrodorsal (A), left ventral–right dorsal
               oblique (B), and right ventral–left dorsal oblique (C)
               radiographs of a lumbar myelogram show a right‐sided
               extradural  lesion  at L3–4.  The  ventrodorsal view
               shows a slight deviation of the right contrast column
               medially but this lesion is more evident on the oblique
               projections.
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89